Forgive me if I slip into some cliff metaphors for the next few posts, but the employment of the tool actually makes more sense in this context. The fact is that the expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, as explained by Adam Levin of Credit.com, represents a real threat to a nascent housing recovery, because it will put a deep freeze on a very large chunk of current US home sales.
In addition to treating homeowners to a gratuitous kick in the teeth, Congressional inaction on this tax provision would be a disaster. As economic momentum is kicking in, uncertainty regarding something as essential as homeownership will put a damper on consumer confidence.
Additionally, if the tax provision is allowed to expire, the market-friendly trend of banks approving short sales (nearly 340,000 of them in the year that ended in September), in which banks allow a property to be sold for less than the debt — reducing the glut of foreclosed homes, stabilizing prices, and cutting lenders’ losses — will come to a screeching halt.
Failure to extend this provision could also scuttle the hard-won $25 billion mortgage foreclosure settlement so painstakingly negotiated by the federal government — an agreement requiring banks to use the preponderance of the settlement money to help borrowers, with a minimum of $10 billion slated for principal reduction.
A world where the MFDRA expires is a world where practically no short sales go forward, where practically no debt relief gets administered, and a world with more delinquencies and foreclosure starts and less methods to dispose of the inventory. The reason that rental housing has become such a popular investment opportunity for the private equity/hedge fund crowd is that it has been easy to obtain distressed housing, through short sales for example. There’s also an expectation that the market will continue to rise that has motivated these sales, and if you kick short sales out of the conversation, that expectation will suddenly dissipate.
Sales of homes in some stage of foreclosure remain elevated, 20% of all US sales nationwide, and closer to 30-40% in the most distressed regions. Short sales of homes not in foreclosure, additionally, represented 22% of all home sales in the third quarter.
In sum, the progress in working through the backlog of inventory would come to a halt, and home sales as well as prices would suffer as a result. And housing stands as a bright spot, relatively speaking, in the recovery at this time. I don’t know if you can model the impact of the spending cuts in the sequester relative to the expiration of the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act, but they’d be more similar than different.
We saw earlier in this depressed housing market how an expiring tax break, in that case the ill-advised first-time homebuyer’s tax credit, can distort a market still weighed down by fundamental problems. There’s no question that the looming expiration of the debt relief tax exemption has carried forward short sales in particular, and that will generate a crash if nothing gets done in the waning few weeks of the Congressional session.
Photo by Bart Hanlon under Creative Commons license.





17 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I doubt expiration of the MFDRA will change much. The IRS insolvency test covers a very high percentage of the people with liability for debt forgiveness.
I don’t really agree, especially w/r/t short sales. Tax insolvency is a harder climb than mere insolvency, and the class affected doesn’t necessarily have the kind of tax counsel that makes such a pleading smooth and easy. It’s a major hassle and people would rather not risk it. The industry knows this; that’s why they’re wrapping up so many short sales as quickly as possible.
Just playing a little devil’s advocate here, wouldn’t it be better to provide direct government assistance to low-income families, rather than indirectly using the tax code to subsidize people taking a loss on an investment? Housing already receives tremendous tax advantages, which was one of the factors making the bubble as bad as it was.
It seems like the solution is the opposite approach – stop subsidizing housing. Instead, subsidize people, based on need.
DD sounds like a shill for the NAR. And since when do we cheer for higher housing prices? Lower prices are the solution, not the problem.
The housing market is down so lets really clean out the deadwood. Eliminate the mortage deduction. Its value is overstated and it also deludes people into thinking they should own a home when they probably should not. my family that has a gross earnings of ~200k, and a ~200k mortage at 4.1% with <10 years left. The total value of the intrest deduction was only 3k. To people in a lower bracket with a smaller mortage this value would be much less. Just because you get a tax deduction does not mean it is really worth anything. If we could teach people to do the math, they would understand that unless they have a large income and a large mortage, the value of the deduction is not that great. Maybe without chasing the deduction, people would buy the house they could really afford with a mortage they could afford. After all the yelling and screaming when they eliminated the intrest deduction on autoloans and credit cards, those industries did ok.
David I agree with this but is there still significant institutional buying going on in the short sales? I heard (from you I think) that some big investors were unhappy with the returns from buying and renting foreclosures. Down the road seems worse even if there is no double dip. A REIT that is the landlord of a mega unit apt. building is different from owning hundreds of single family dwellings. Won’t banks be the owners of the millions of homes doing the reverse mortgage option as well?
a good read
http://www.salon.com/2012/12/10/5_biggest_threats_to_the_middle_class/
Definitely interesting. I would add, though, every one of those threats are precisely the responsibility of the federal government to address.
For example, there’s nothing really that wrong with Wal-Mart paying barely more than minimum wage. The problem is that the minimum wage is essentially indentured servitude. Or take banking. There’s nothing wrong with trying to make a quick buck or paying performance bonuses. The problem is when the government under taxes winners, bails out losers, and fails to prosecute criminal behavior.
The result of the 1% who own the corporations and the government. There is something wrong with them.
Yep, definitely agree. I just don’t like the blameshifting that it seems like a lot of even highly educated Democrats engage in acting like corporations rule government rather than government ruling corporations. (The subheading for that article is, “It’s time to stop blaming the federal government and start looking at the parasitism of corporate America”…which is basically the ‘Democrats can’t do anything’ defense.)
The unwillingness to use the power of USFG is a different problem from USFG not possessing useful power :)
Particularly when our political leaders are so eager to flex their muscles against more marginalized and voiceless targets in ways that are just downright cruel and counterproductive.
D.C. Democrats and uber wealthy Democrats are just the same as Republicans and uber wealthy Republicans but for a false patina of caring for the working poor.
imo…they are inseparable
What if we made them all sit down and watch “A Christmas Carol”?
Republicans would like “old” Scrooge (Rich and doesn’t care) and Democrats would like “new” Scrooge (Still rich but sort of does care) and Cratchett would still have to work black friday and Christmas eve.
If in default there are few choices. A short sale preserves some credit worthiness.
In Sacramento we have Blackstone and other hedge funds buying short sales on a massive scale. Now the ex-home owner who was pushed out by the pumping of money into the housing market through fraudulent loans can rent from a slum absentee landlord. Maybe even the same house where my son put on a $50K tile roof required by the Homeowners Association and new wood floors. When real estate crashed so did his “home improvement” business. The wealthy scammers are still busy creating markets with their billions. Problem is there are no jobs. Not a problem for a fat cat. Only for the mouse he chases. Good that my son got out in 2012 with an actual sale proving he is out (probably no legal loan ownership papers in existence) so the IRS and “bank” can not go after him for more money. The short sale will be a credit problem for several years. Not that anyone in their right mind would want to take a chance on ownership in these tracks bought by Blackstone soon to be slums.
This seems to be very common and “shanty” towns is a good term to use. I can imagine many “middle class” suburbs turning into slums with Corporate landlords who won’t invest in upkeep like a resident homeowner would. As the neighborhood declines with one in three or more corporate owned homes property values will fall even further and the slum will result. Empty houses next to multi tenant rentals decaying infrastructure. Bankers will learn how hard it is for homeowners to keep up their “tract” homes they make fun of at the Countryclub.