Despite large protests and thousands of demonstrators, lawmakers in Michigan, as expected, granted final approval to right to work legislation, which will ban closed shop unions and allow workers to opt out of union dues despite having their employment covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
The first of two bills, which installs right to work for public employees, passed the state House 58-51, having already passed the state Senate. Another bill, which would cover private employees, should pass the House later today. Seeing that Democrats picked up 5 House members in the November elections, and that all of the current Democrats voted against right to work, the legislation would have failed if it was not taken up in the lame duck session with the legislature elected in 2010.
The scene in Lansing was reminiscent of Madison, Wisconsin in early 2011, albeit under different circumstances. There, Democratic lawmakers had walked out of the state, denying a quorum for a vote on controversial anti-union legislation that would limit collective bargaining. But Michigan has no such measure in its legislative rules, and so Democrats could only slow down but not stop the legislation from passing. Over 10,000 protesters nonetheless marched against right to work today in the capital. Three school districts closed because so many teachers went out to protest.
Governor Rick Snyder can now choose to sign the bills or veto them, and since he orchestrated this entire sneak attack, signage is virtually assured. However, labor leaders have pointed out that they can still try to overturn the legislation at the ballot, through a signature-gathering process. The law would in all likelihood go into effect in April 2013, and that ballot measure would not be put before voters until November 2014, however, meaning over a year and a half of operating under the anti-union environment, which will starve labor of funds that they would need to fight out right to work in a campaign.
Statewide Democrats and even the President have criticized right to work as divisive and anti-worker legislation.
Michigan will become the 24th state in America to enact right to work legislation. In almost every case, this has significantly lowered union density, and as a result, wages. This is why labor leaders usually call it “right to work for less.”




6 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’m not a labor expert by any means, but I don’t see any way to read this other than a UAW fail.
They’re sitting on a billion dollars. They should OWN Michigan politics.
Their composition as a labor union that is by, for and of its retirees may be catching up with it. What’s the ratio, 6:1 retirees to workers? It would appear that their narrow focus on benefits (an important fight, don’t get me wrong) has had serious consequences.
Award for dumbest comment of the day goes to UAW execs who say the law won’t have any impact on them because their voluntary membership rates are high even in right-to-work states. I’d love to see a post on all the ways that statement is just horribly, tragically wrong. It wouldn’t be a short one.
Right-to-work hurts everyone. Labor unions seem adrift these days.
The next step for the PTB…right to live States vs. their population (you know the humans who buy the shit they make in China)
Or else the UAW is doing exactly what it wants to do. Bob King’s making good money. Gettelfinger did, too. Union heads are powerful people who get to hobnob with the president (when the president’s a Democrat).
Unions never mount challenges capable of winning anything. They mount small actions designed to let the rank-and-file (who are really the working class, while they, the union mucky mucks, are the coordinator class) let off steam. And the cycle repeats.
Until workers force union coordinators to mount real challenges, they won’t.
Trumka, Weingarten, the former Mr. Jane Hamsher (Stern) — they and their ilk are the biggest enemies the working class has. I hate no one more than them. At the same time, it’s the logic of the system. If Mother Teresa ran the UAW, they’d be doing the exact same things.
Wonder when the UAW president, Bob King resigns? After all he was stupid enough to trust Snyder.
It’s time for unions to start being unions again and not use their position to hob-knob with the political class. Unions won the fight 70 years ago, not in the halls of legislators, but in the street of America.
How about start over with NEW unions that resemble OWS principles and worker rights?