An hour after receiving two anti-union “right to work” bills from the Michigan legislature, Governor Rick Snyder signed them, alone, without fanfare, a sure sign of pride of ownership. Michigan becomes the 24th state to go to right to work, but the law will not take effect until April, and workers operating under current contracts are exempted from the rules. That puts a delayed effect on the ultimate implementation of the law, which could work to the advantage of the labor movement as they figure out a response.
I have no doubt there will be one, unlike in Indiana, where labor has not really attempted to overturn the law. I believe they had less options at their disposal, but there are tools available in Michigan, as well as a relatively dense unionized labor force ready to fight back.
According to the Detroit News, labor leaders have already filed suit against the passage of the law, arguing that it violated the state’s Open Meetings Act. In particular, they said the barring of the Capitol last week, and the lack of public hearings in the committee process, denied public input. You may recall that labor used the same tactic in Wisconsin, arguing that a hastily scheduled conference committee on that state’s anti-union law violated open meetings requirements. That suit was successful until it reached a partisan state Supreme Court, which basically argued that the legislature can do whatever it wants, the law be damned. The Michigan Supreme Court has a 4-3 Republican split right now, so that avenue is precarious.
The next possible step would be to pass a law overturning right to work at the ballot box. They can do this via a statutory initiative, which would require 258,000 signatures in order to reach the ballot. The decision to pursue this has not yet been made, probably because of the sting of losing a Constitutional amendment enshrining collective bargaining as a right just this past November. But just as labor may have overreached with that measure, the anti-union forces may have overreached on right to work.
So option #3 would be to wait for 2014, and attempt to throw out the Republican legislature and Rick Snyder. After the 2012 elections, Michigan Republicans hold a 59-51 advantage. There actually were no state Senate elections in Michigan in 2012, so the advantage remains very large in that chamber, 26-12. So Democrats would have to pick up 5 House seats and 8 Senate seats to gain control, as well as the Governor’s mansion. As several Republicans voted against right to work, they may not need all those votes to repeal the law. However, presumably a chamber of the legislature still in Republican control would resist a repeal vote.
Whatever the outcome, you can expect an actual fight here in the aftermath of the lame duck sneak attack on worker rights.





14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Can’t play offense without strategy. Can’t have strategy without vision. Can’t have vision without theory. The only theory the left has is how to run small-to-medium-sized businesses.
Things getting worse isn’t enough. The left likes using the “boiling frog” analogy, but things have gotten pretty horrendous pretty quickly (in relative terms) in Greece. See any real change there? No, you don’t.
Must have theory -> vision -> strategy. This won’t happen, though, until the left is willing and able to acknowledge the existence of a third class: the coordinator class.
For the umpteenth time, the left represents the overseers, not the field slaves. And this especially applies to unions.
I’m looking forward when all of those overpaid CEO jobs are shipped overseas to China as well. And why the hell are fire fighters and police officers exempt from this and other so-called right-to-work laws? Could it be because the corporate elite need these union thugs on their side to protect and save them from an angry mob of low-wage workers.
Thanks for this excellent reporting DD!! For readers interested in the horrendous social and economic costs, to states that pass RTW laws, I encourage them to view this recent study:
https://portal.iuoelocal150.org/Legislative/Documents/UMKC%20Study%20-%20Chapter%206.pdf
You answered your own question correctly!!
Geez, what I saw was a closed door, lame duck, double cross, and more flat out lies by another corrupt, corporate funded Republican governor. Who, of course, is doing his best to help the average Michigan resident lose health benefits, lose good paying jobs, etc on the premise that; ” there’s a light at the end of the tunnel. ” By now, though, progressives all know that the light he’s talking about is just another underground ” corporate shafting ” project .
Another fixed election. People are not voting to earn less money in a run away economy nor are small business people voting to cause their customers to be harvested either. When will people learn that these outcomes are one hundred percent implausible. We are being robbed and have been for decades.
Yep, I have no confidence that my electronically counted anti-”Right-to-Work” vote was included in the official result. None at all.
When all wages are cut and people get poorer and poorer who is going to buy these products that the rich produce and sell? I refrain from buying this crap right now.
After six decades I’m not sure the rich produce and sell much of anything. Usually, like most snakes, they get some poor naive to labor at the production end, a middle class peddler at the selling end; all while they’re laying in the grass waiting to devour the profits. Then it’s just a couple of quick stops at ” the pits ” before they slither off to some pristine island and destroy its’ balanced biosphere. The 2 stops are Congress and Wall Street, in that order, of course.
Whatever the method, MI labor needs to pursue a timely result. What tanked Wisconsin was largely the lengthy lag time between Walker’s spawn and his recall election. Some 14-15 months, no?
In WI the public simply got tired of the conflict. Labor didn’t tire, of course, but didn’t take into account the voting public at large.
Consider Gray Davis’ recall in CA. That all happened quickly, and he was gone. Had it dragged out over many months or a year or two, he probably would have prevailed. Whoever holds the high ground long enough may have an advantage.
All I’m suggesting in MI is for labor to try whatever would be fastest right away, then move on to the next option if need be. Don’t dilly dally.
Ironically, passage of right-to-work legislation will make matters even worse for the Michigan Democratic Party. Labor leaders, who have run the party for generations, will tighten their grip on the party machinery. That is not a good thing: the MDP leadership is the equivalent of the Soviet Politburo: aging, inbred, wedded to the past, and averse to outsiders.
The MDP is a classic example of the Iron Law of Institutions. The party leadership, in particular Chairman for Life Mark Brewer, have–and will–put their own interests ahead of those of the party. Which is why I walked away from it.
I’d like to see the legislature filled with independents, the two party system is not working for the people, not only in Michigan but in Washington as well.
Agreed.
Independents like Joe Lieberman or Bernie Sanders? That’s not a hard question for most, I agree. A 3rd and 4th Party would be my wish. The spectrum is at least that wide, yes?