Former Democratic Presidential candidate John Kerry has been chosen to serve as Secretary of State, according to a Chicago Sun-Times columnist who heard it from an unidentified White House source.
This doesn’t exactly come from left field. Kerry, the chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, was rumored to be on the short list for the job, along with UN Ambassador Susan Rice. Rice took herself out of the running this week. Kerry gave Obama arguably the biggest opportunity of his political life – the chance to address the Democratic National Convention as keynote speaker in 2004, during his nominating convention. Kerry also supported Obama over Hillary Clinton in 2008. If loyalty gets rewarded at all, Kerry proved himself plenty loyal for the job. And his tenure on Foreign Relations and accessibility to diplomatic situations – he helped resolve several snafus in Afghanistan over the past few years – shows him to at least fulfill the job requirements at State. He has also traveled to Pakistan and Sudan on unofficial diplomatic trips for the Administration during this past term. He’s basically been Secretary of State-in-waiting.
Above all, Kerry is a mainline Democrat on foreign affairs issues. He voted to go to war in Iraq and then turned against the war. He supported the mission in Afghanistan for several years. He has not been a vocal opponent whatsoever to the new American ways of war. He’s an establishment figure, and I don’t expect him to really deviate from that in the position, should he get confirmed, which seems like a virtual certainty. I don’t even know that he’ll hold much policy power in an Obama White House on foreign policy issues; if Susan Rice gets some executive branch slot like national security advisor, she would arguably hold more influence.
The political fallout from Kerry’s nomination would be a special election to replace him for the Massachusetts Senate seat, with Republican Scott Brown waiting in the wings. I wouldn’t be so sure he gets that chance. In 2004, with Kerry running for President and Mitt Romney in office ready to grant an appointment, the Democratic legislature in Massachusetts stripped Romney of that power by passing a change to the Senate vacancy laws, putting in place a special election within 180 days of the vacancy. After Ted Kennedy died, the legislature changed the law again, allowing for a temporary appointment (Paul Kirk) so that Democrats could sustain 60 votes in the Senate, and in particular pass the health care bill, at that time. There’s no reason that the legislature, before the Kerry confirmation, couldn’t change the law again, eliminate the off-year special election, and let the appointee serve through until 2014, with an election at that time. Kerry’s term is up in 2014 anyway. And obviously, Democrats in the Massachusetts legislature aren’t embarrassed to change Senate vacancy laws purely according to circumstances.
So it’s not a sure bet that Brown would get a chance in a special election. Even if he does, this is not someone who would sneak up on voters but someone who Elizabeth Warren largely exposed through her campaign. There’s still concern about the lack of a decent candidate in the state to go up against Brown. But you cannot be sure that Brown returns to the Senate in that seat.
As for the Foreign Relations Committee, the chairmanship is likely to go to Bob Menendez. Barbara Boxer is next in line, but she would have to give up her gavel on the Environment and Public Works Committee, and she’s disinclined to do so.





29 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
If he is nominated Kerry will arouse opposition and controversy from Swift Boaters and others as he should b/c like Obama he lacks principal.
My personal un-favorite Kerry moment happened when Kerry was standing next to the Grand Canyon in August of 2004. It was a hot political summer, unlike the recent one, and Bush had been badgering Kerry for his position on the terrible Iraq War which had started the previous year with a US invasion. Kerry, who had voted for the war like most Dems, had an answer.
Kerry stands by ‘yes’ vote on Iraq war
Hoo-ray?
More worrisome to me is what sinecure Obama will find for his mentor Lieberman.
A Democrat? Really?
What, were there no Republicans available?
“. . .Kerry is a mainline Democrat on foreign affairs issues. . .”
—————
If I’m not mistaken, didn’t Kerry ruminate about ramping up the ethnically balkanized Iraq about ten years ago? There would be officially separated Kurd, Sunni, Shiite regions . . . or were they to be separate nations?
Someone was pushing that notion, if not Kerry I don’t recall who it was.
If I’m correct, in fairness to Kerry, others have been floatina similar idea applied to Iran. As in, we’re from the West and here to help you.
1) Foreign policy difference HRC/Rice/Kerry – maximum 5%
2) Why does the Obama Administration persist in allowing Republicans to make personnel decisions for them?
Book Salon up with Matthew Stein’s When Disaster Strikes: A Comprehensive Guide for Emergency Planning and Crisis Survival hosted by Barry Eisler
[Vid] John Kerry Confronted on Building 7 “Controlled Fashion” Comment (by http://WeAreChange.Org)
John “I’ll get back to you”-while running-down-the-hall Kerry? This will be fun.
So as SoS will he get the chance to name the last man to die for a mistake in Afghanistan? And will he see what it is like to tell him?
Not perfect but who cares. He should have beat Bush, actually I think he did like Gore. Revenge is a dish best served cold.
Losing Kerry in the Senate is not good. Why not Barbara Boxer? Or Al Gore?
But there is wheeling and dealing going, no doubt. I still don’t trust this administration.
You are mistaken. That was Joltin’ Joe Biden that proposed a balkanized Iraq. And now Gorbachev is saying that the US will break up like the USSR if it continues with its present insane foreign policies. There must be a common thread there somewhere.
They’d better get moving. An ill Hillary Clinton fainted, has a concussion, and is now recovering at home.
How about bringing Condi Rice back? Obama voted for her before. She has a great idea: The United States “should follow Paris’s lead and then vet and arm [the new Syria coalition] on the condition that it pursues an inclusive post-Assad framework. The United States’ weight and influence are needed. Leaving this to regional powers, whose interests are not identical to ours, will only exacerbate the deepening sectarianism.”
Carry on Hill’s work, on condition that she pursues an inclusive post-Clinton framework. (Doncha love their hifallutin lingo?)
The irony of the Winter Soldier coming in out of the cold to become the mouthpiece for Amerikan Imperialism is too much.
No, it DOESN’T come from “left” field. :)
Is being wrong about Iraq a prerequisite for this job?
Obama seeks consistency with himself.
good f’king riddance. I probably voted for this guy back in teh 80′s when I lived in Boston, and I sure as hell wasted my vote on him in 1992 and 1996 …
OOOPS – that is the OTHER sell out asshole I voted for, Clinton!
Gawd, through in the votes for Gore 2000, Kerry 2004, 0-bummer 2008, Dudcrap-kis 2004 … the ONLY vote I’m proud of is Jimmy Carter. (Mondale’s pathetic campaign after 1980 was inexcusable – as are the rest …)
Maybe m-ass-holes will get to vote for a REAL democrat, instead of some coakley-kerry dilettante dishrag, obsessed with making sure David Gergen isn’t upset?
When I hear this guy’s name, ya know, the asshole who couldn’t beat bush BUT who was “electable”, I get puke in my mouth.
rmm
It’s entirely possible the Massachusetts legislature will change the requirements for the governor to deal with an empty US senate seat before this is formally announced. It’s not like they haven’t done it before, when they were pretty much convinced John Kerry would beat W in 2004! So, they’ll most likely change the law (for a third, or maybe fourth, time) so that the appointee can serve out the entire term.
I betcha that Kerry, even with his faults, I’m serious now, could accomplish more in Obama’s second term than Clinton has in Obama’s first. I mean, ANYTHING would be more.
“There’s still concern about the lack of a decent candidate in the state to go up against Brown.”
That’s the understatement of the year. Keeping control of the Senate in 2014 is a much higher priority than who gets to be SoS, and the administration doesn’t seem to care.
As for Barbara Boxer wanting to stay at EPW rather than taking a much more powerful position at foreign relations tells you all you need to know about Barbara Boxer. (Lightweight)
E-X-A-C-T-L-Y.
Or maybe the administration wants a full-blown Repug Congress so that they can better seek “bipartisanship” and cry that the mean Repugs made them do it?
-stewartm
If there is a lack of home grown talent, Dems can always bring in a carpetbagger into Mass. After all, they brought Clinton into NY, and made her into a senator. They brought Rahm into Chicago, I am sure they should be able to find a body for the Senate. After all, what does Kerry have? A shining intellect? Force of conviction? Just another centrist. Bodies can be moved around. And I don’t believe Establishment was thrilled with having Warren as a Senator. They need someone corrupt or corruptible. They should have absolutely no problem with finding someone. How about Bob Kerry? Even the last name is will mean less work to change nameplates.
Re: #11
Joe Biden?! Thanks, and I stand corrected. My apologies to Sen Kerry.
“Report: John Kerry to Be Named Secretary of State”
Lest anyone take that at face value, it’s a little more complicated than that, although he is one of their own (the senate club) and they usually follow the unwritten code and never disagree with one another especially concerning foreign affairs — no, not that kind — which is why they work together so well for the public good. (There must be a pony in there somewhere.)
If we can get a self-serving gutless sack of shit like Kerry out of the Senate without having to worry about the return of Scott Brown, I say Good Riddance.
Or more likely Bmull@21 it tells you about the priorities of the State of California and consequently what would provide her with more power within the state. They really like to be able to breath (Environment) and have plenty of water (both Environment and Public Works).
Are you talking about the Republicrats or the Demicans?
What an “inspired” choice! Just kidding.