While the nonsense continues on the fiscal slope, which increasingly looks like something the nation will have to weather, the Senate has been working on an appropriation for states suffering from the disaster caused by Hurricane Sandy. The parallel has to be understood: in one part of Washington, they’re trying to put in a deficit deal to replace politically driven forced austerity, and in another part, they’re trying to respond to a national emergency the way the federal government must in these cases, by spending money. Look at these two things together and you’ll understand a lot about Washington – the compartmentalization, the forced blindness, the lack of knowledge about the economy, everything.
And both sides of the Senate are taking up their predictable positions in the matter. Specifically, Senate Republicans want to nickel and dime disaster relief victims.
Republicans in the Senate, seeking to substantially trim a Hurricane Sandy aid package being sought by Democrats, are planning to unveil a $23.8 billion emergency spending plan to finance the recovery efforts of states devastated by the storm.
The move by Republicans comes as the Senate has opened debate on a $60.4 billion aid bill brought by Democratic leaders. Democrats largely based their proposal on one that President Obama sent to Congress nearly two weeks ago.
The alternative aid package is being introduced by Senator Dan Coats, Republican of Indiana. Democrats say it is a token proposal intended to give cover to Republicans who will not vote for the larger bill.
That’s about the size of it.
Fortunately for Senate Republicans, none of them hail from states most particularly affected by Hurricane Sandy. So this becomes a no-brainer to them, since they never feel anything resembling compassion unless trouble befalls them or a member of their family.
The sad fact is that it’s overwhelmingly likely that Congress ends up appropriating $0.00 to New York, New Jersey and the other states suffering in the aftermath of Sandy. It’s not anywhere close to the radar screen in the House, and the Senate has this $40 billion divide. So everyone’s working hard to figure out how best to cut spending and raise taxes, to avoid a program of spending cuts and tax increases, which people favoring a fiscal slope deal don’t even seem to understand. But we’ve completely severed the relationship between government and its responsibilities, and so several states that were drowned won’t see anything in the way of restitution.
One of the more disgusting things the President said in a long time was at yesterday’s press conference, when he appealed to lawmakers to pass a deficit deal because the country has been through so much. So, cut Social Security benefits because everyone’s sad about hurricanes and school shootings. The quote was, “When you think about what we’ve gone through over the last couple months — a devastating hurricane, and now one of the worst tragedies in our memory — the country deserves us to be willing to compromise on behalf of the greater good.” Um, Congress can’t even pass legislation RESPONDING to those events! Which, by the way, would involve doing the OPPOSITE of what the President things would serve the greater good; namely, spending money, rather than “smartly” cutting it, to address human needs.
Photo by Mike (Inbet_1979) under Creative Commons license.





14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
take these guys out and drop them off in the center of either Camden or Newark. Make them strip naked with no money and leave them there. I am sure certain people of either city would welcome these guys with open arms!
Sorry if I come off a bit tough today but I have had it! :)
Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for Peter Peterson.
Let’s stop picking on rich plutocrats; they are doing all they can. We are still the richest Country in the world and that is something I will be proud of as I stand in line for soup.
Oh, and also, how many votes will the Rs lose in the NE? Now you have the rest of the picture.
How will Gov. Christie react when his own party reduces the amount of help that his state will get?
It’s mind boggling to contemplate what the President means when he says “on behalf of the greater good.” That’s just nuts in light of the proposals coming form him and endorsed by Pelosi. UGH!
I took it as a given that the media glare on Newtown would be used as cover to help push through a pro-plutocrat resolution to this phony budget crisis, but I didn’t imagine Obama would go so far as to explicitly bring the massacre into it. He’s a pig.
Narcissists actually believe their own bullshit so it makes sense.
Good point. I wouldn’t want to be around when THAT guy throws a fit. MIght register at the USGS office in Boulder.
Should be interesting to see if congress’s “approval rating” can actually go into negative numbers. That is, not only do 0% of the people in the country approve of the job they are doing, but any number of dead people are rolling over in their graves showing their disapproval.
As long as they keep getting re-elected they really don’t give a rats ass what the people think. Besides when have “the people” taken me on a Gulfstream jet to Scotland for a game of golf?
See below
Won’t happen. The pollsters phone calls cannot get through to the infernal switchboard. The Republicans, who believe in the afterlife, have denied using public funding to the phone companies for providing service to those in the afterlife.
The phone companies have refused to provide service as their investment because there’s no coming back after the bill collectors depart to collect bad debts.
We will have to assume what people in the afterlife would say and then we could have a negative approval rating. I am sure my sainted mother and grandparents would like to stick a hot poker up Congress’ collective ass if they could get a call in the afterlife.