Hearings in Congress today pile on the political debate over the attack on the US consulate in Benghazi. The hearings come on the heels of the Pickering-Mullen report, which looked at the actions of the State Department and foreign service leading up to the attack, finding serious deficiencies in management and “grossly inadequate” security at the consulate. As a result four senior State Department officials resigned.
The senior State Department staffers who resigned included Eric Boswell, the assistant secretary for diplomatic security; Charlene Lamb, a deputy assistant secretary responsible for embassy security; and another unnamed person in the diplomatic security bureau, officials said. Raymond Maxwell, a deputy assistant secretary who oversaw Libya, Algeria, Tunisia and Morocco in the Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs, was identified by the Associated Press as the fourth official to resign.
They were held responsible for failing to act on requests for more guards and better fortifications for the U.S. compound in Benghazi, a city overrun by armed militiamen.
I don’t think foreign policy experts would describe Benghazi as “overrun,” but the larger point here is that these State Department officials actually took a measure of responsibility for their actions.
Smelling blood, Senate Republicans pounced today, saying they need the Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, to personally come in and testify (she’s recuperating from a concussion). She’s already scheduled for testimony next month before the Foreign Relations Committee, but hearings are a time for bloviating.
The report does not describe any kind of cover-up about the Benghazi affair. It does not aver that the White House sought to minimize political damage from the event by claiming that it was inspired by an anti-Muslim video, for example. Really we have a situation where embassy security budgets fell, predictably, since the whole of government’s budget fell in the years described. And the calls for increased security in this specific embassy were not met with action. I would like to be a fly on the wall at the House Republican appropriations committee meeting, if a request for increased embassy security ever got discussed, just to see the variance between how that gets discussed there rather than in the open air.
Certainly there were failures at State and possibly in the intelligence gathering process; that could be the focus of post-Benghazi efforts, if the political shroud over this lifted.





16 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
You don’t suppose any of those wankers with a (R) after their name will ask about the roll budgets cuts and privatization may have played, do you? No? Didn’t think so.
Fuck Bob Corker.
Good points and sadly every post you and Jon write about Congress could correctly use the word bloviate somewhere in the story.
Long time no see.
Where ya’ been???
Speaking of congress. I am quite disappointed that my term “legislaturds” has not caught on more. I was really hoping to eventually get that either in Bartlett’s Famous Quotes or the Miriam Webster Dictionary.
I do want to make it clear I am the author of the phrase, “Better to have something you don’t need than to need something you don’t have.” I am quite proud that phrase, penned by me in October of 1982, has made its way into today’s lexicon.
Back OT. I suppose somebody will get blamed. Maybe more than one. But, my take on this is that we weren’t expecting anything like this and no matter what, were probably ill equipped to handle it. It’s not like we NEVER had an embassy overrun before. 12 Marines or whatever are not much of a match for an angry, well armed mob.
Government report finds no cover up within government…. SCHOCKING!! Its amazing just how much liberals get duped and exposed as Democratic partisans when it comes to these types of scandals…. The outing of a CIA agent (Plame) was the biggest, most politicized, story in the world in the left blogosphere… Republicans typically scoffed… Now we have Benghazi, Republicans politicize, and liberals scoff.
Government blames “deranged muslims” hopped up over a video that nobody had ever seen (obvious CIA psyops) and good ole liberals fall in line with that narrative…. yep, they hate our freedom *sigh*
Instead of being the least bit self reflective about our governments policies and even considering the possibility of legitimate blow back we fall back into good ole “post 911 narrative”
What do the wingnuts care about this? That Hillary Clinton “fainted” and hurt herself from her ‘flu’ so that she can’t testify on Benghazi!
Well isn’t that Convenient!
If she is too frail to testify before Congress, then she can no longer fulfill her duties as Secretary, and should be replaced. You can’t have it both ways.
all evidence to the contrary; the 1% are getting it both ways.
Not this liberal. I know what you mean though. Standards and principles mean nothing to the folks you’re talking about. It’s all about obama and the dems even as they do exactly what the repubs did during the bush era.
So much ado about the deaths of four CIA operatives.
Notice how the fact that CIA was still (still!) operating an illegal prison on the grounds, and that was the reason for the attack, gets swept under the rug b/c its officially classified so no one can mention it.
i smell rotten fish
she could live video testify,from her little palace
Idiot libs- spreading lies or speaking on things they know nothing about. Remember Charlene Lamb’s testimony before congress in October? Choke on the fat one.
http://rncresearch.tumblr.com/post/33401598185/the-state-department-testified-before-congress-that
Idiot libs- spreading lies or speaking on things they know nothing about. Remember Charlene Lamb’s testimony before congress in October? Choke on the fat one. http://rncresearch.tumblr.com/post/33401598185/the-state-department-testified-before-congress-that
It wasn’t a consulate and the report doesn’t say that it was. It was a “Special Mission” compound. And why should State provide security for such a (CIA) place?
But nevertheless, State took the rap, and several State employees fell on their swords. Better that than have the Agency be blamed for anything. And so now everybody hates State.
I wonder who these people were — the report doesn’t say. “. . .talented and committed, but relatively inexperienced, American personnel.” On temporary assignments. In a Special Mission compound.