I was racking my brain for one final story that sums up this era in politics, the state of our world circa 2012, and I have to give it to this one from a few days ago.
William Bryan Jennings, whose parents obviously hoped for a Progressive populist reformer as a child, grew up to work at Morgan Stanley, and acquire all the sense of entitlement and douchebaggery that goes along with such an occupation (I believe they give that to you at the same time as your parking space). One year ago to the day, on December 21, 2011, Jennings left a Christmas party in New York City, and his town car didn’t show up (#richwhitepeopleproblems). So he hailed a cab to take him to his home in Darien, Connecticut. When he got home, Jennings decided to treat the cab ride like a buyout deal, and trying to negotiate down for a lower fare. This is an executive at Morgan Stanley who didn’t want to pay full fare to get home. The cabbie asked for $204 (Jennings said it was $294). Jennings offered $50 (good negotiating ploy; start low!). At this point I should mention that Jennings makes around $3 million a year.
The cabbie went to the police to settle the argument, driving away from the home. So Jennings did the obvious thing: he pulled out a pen knife and started fighting with the Middle Eastern cabbie, yelling racial slurs like “Go back to your own fucking country” and “I’m going to kill you, motherfucker,” cutting him on the right hand and eventually escaping from the cab. Jennings ran home and spent two months hiding from the police before coming forward.
You know how this story ends. Jennings got away with it. The state dropped the charges because the cabbie held onto the pen knife for five months before delivering it to police, thereby tainting the evidence. So it’s the same old story; entitled, rich banker assaulting a working person and getting away with it on a technicality. William Bryan Jennings was too big to fail.
But a funny thing happened. Morgan Stanley fired the guy for breaching their internal code of conduct.
William Bryan Jennings, the banker whose assault and hate-crime charges over a dispute with a New York cab driver were dropped, was fired by Morgan Stanley and is now reportedly trying to get millions in deferred compensation denied him by his former employer [...]
Jennings and his attorney did not immediately return a request for comment. An unnamed spokesman for Jennings told the Journal: “The issue is not Mr. Jennings’ conduct. The issue is Morgan Stanley’s conduct. Morgan Stanley knew Mr. Jennings was victimized and still fired him and still kept his money.”
A spokeswoman for Morgan Stanley provided a statement:
“While we cannot comment on specific instances or individuals, the claw back provisions in our compensation model allow us to take action where appropriate when an employee engages in conduct that is detrimental to the firm, including conduct that causes damage to the firm’s franchise and reputation, or creates a situation in which the Firm suffers losses or is exposed to excessive financial or regulatory risks.”
This seems like a case of just desserts, and it is. But the flip side of this is that Morgan Stanley saw the opportunity to deny compensation to one of their executives after he embarrassed the firm, and they made it a pretty good deal for them by clawing back as much as $5 million in compensation. The firm did not suffer any losses from this sorry tale, let’s be honest. But Morgan Stanley can use that for their own financial advantage.
So this is the perfect Wall Street story: entitled, self-absorbed assholes, the fecklessness of the justice system, and firms taking any opportunity to make money off the exchange.
America!






30 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Whew! This is your farewell story? It really has everything, doesn’t it?
Man earning $3million stiffs cabbie ($50? NYC to Darien????). Well, he deserved to get fired…but then…oh well, it isn’t necessary to spell it all out, is it?
Nice pick, Dave. May the road rise up to meet you, man (you probably know the rest)…
Wow. Even by the abysmal standards of the modern day USA, this story is astounding.
A perfect Wall Street story, indeed!
Thank you for such an appropriate end chapter.
I echo tejanarusa, David Dayen, may you always have the wind at your back, your eyes on the truth, and may your voice always be heard.
Fare thee well, DDay!!!
DW
A little Karma coming full circle, nice.
This is a little OT but, no better venue than this story: Has anyone out there seen the new ad campaign by JP Morgan? I’m in the Milwaukee TV market and saw this commercial twice in the last week featuring dripping pro-America imagery of Home of the Brave, land of opportunity, work hard and get ahead,fair play, blah, blah, blah. And then at the end, this message sponsored by JP Morgan. I, literally, LOL. The propagandic hypocrisy was astounding.
Any other parts of the country having this smoke blown up your skirts?
Finally, Good luck David. I have enjoyed your work.
The autogenerated Chase ad is a nice touch.
Any story about Wall St is a rubicks cube.
I thought the corps like Morgan Stanley gave implicit immunity to the $3+ million types for such stuff unless they are prosecuted. That is, maybe Morgan Stanley was already looking for a way to get rid of him anyway. A stabbing would be convenient for them.
They are running out of little people to eat.
Cannibalism has started.
I wonder what bank William Bryan Jennings works for now. I wonder if the cabbie still has his job.
Thanks DD the best for you in the future.
And what was in his severance package?
Darien Times
If this was a country western song, his wife would have left him too.
Thanks for all the excellent posts, DD. Happy Holidays and happy trails.
What an idea: Morgan Stanley has a reputation to protect, and it isn’t as a back-stabbing crowd of self-righteous assholes.
David,
Been reading you since you were contributing at Digby’s “Hullabaloo.” Been a lurker mostly on the Lake since Marcy’s/Scooter Libby days.
Had to go through some effort to locate FDL password to tell you how much I’ve appreciated your excellent articles the past few years here. You were a daily read and your ability to make sense out of some of the most complicated news once Obama won got me through some hard times as the rest of the Dem Blogosphere seemed winged out or started to shut down and many of the best departed for other opportunities.
Best to you wherever you land! Still hope you will stop in occasionally if something catches your eye and you feel a need to speak out. You will be sorely missed.
I can certainly understand why Morgan Stanley would fire him.
I mean, OK, he stabbed a guy, but then he left a witness alive to testify. A clear violation of the banking industry’s Code of Ethics.
I hope the cabbie still sues him.
America right now reminds me more of Chicago in the 1920s than any pre-revolutionary European era.
Happy Holidays and best wishes, David. Hope to see you back here in comments or as a diarist from time to time.
Ohmmmm
I remember this story well from last year.
The cabbie would probably have a pretty good civil case — though potential damages might not be worth the attorney fees. I think I’d want a change of venue from Fairfield County though. They might all be assholes.
Until we meet again. I hear MSNBC is looking for a counterweight to Ed Rendell and Harold Ford. Thanks David.
O Guillotine, sweet Guillotine, how we miss you, Guillotine!
Where’s Robespierre when we need him?
Anyway, well done, David. I shall miss your posts very much. Hope you return from time to time to point out the flaws of such as me when I write my own.
Ah, this story just warms the cockles of my heart. Beats “It’s A Wonderful Life” all to hell, in my opinion.
U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!
Book Salon up with Jon Krampner’s Creamy and Crunchy: An Informal History of Peanut Butter, the All-American Food hosted by Toby Wollin
Maybe we needs ta have da boys to pay him a little visit. Kind of friendly like.
(sound of machine gun bolts being drawn back)
Did the cabbie deserve being attacked? Absolutely not.
You state:
“You know how this story ends. Jennings got away with it. The state dropped the charges because the cabbie held onto the pen knife for five months before delivering it to police, thereby tainting the evidence. So it’s the same old story; entitled, rich banker assaulting a working person and getting away with it on a technicality.”
DD, this “technicality” is otherwise known as the law.
Was the evidence tainted?
Who knows. If the situation were reversed, would you be writing this story? If Jennings were the one to keep the knife for 5 months would you be fighting for him?
Me thinks not. You really are reaching here
Gonna miss you and your musings a whole lot, Mr. Dayen.
Perhaps I’ll catch you guesting at Calitics or something.
Thanks so much for all you’ve done for the readers.
Really, gonna, miss you . . . *sniff*
Best to you and yours hoss, live life to the fullest to the end.
I have to remember this guy’s face in case I run into him handing out fries at a Burger King somewhere. Now that would be justice.
Stabbing-the-peasants privileges at Morgan Stanley start at the $5 million per annum pay grade. Guy should have read his contract.
So long and good luck, DD.
We are all in this together but some are more together than others. Perfect denouement for your last post but your final act has not been written. Et sic pendens…
This dispute happened December 21, 2011. The banker filed for the case be dismissed on March 28, 2012. The criminal charges were dropped October 15, 2012, when the banker no longer worked for Morgan Stanley. This story seems to have surfaced at this time merely to report a year later on the outcome of a conflict where neither party was going to “cave”.
The cabbie is not only out his entire fare, but he has lost time trying to exact revenge by making a civil case of non-payment into a criminal hate crime.
The bankers is not only out lots of legal fees that are certainly in the thousands at $500-$1000 and hour, but also of a job and millions in pay for standing on principle that $5 a miles was too high and refusing to “cave”.
These two parties have acted just like David Dayen has demanded Obama operate: never give an inch, never compromise, never cave, because Obama like, the banker and the cabbie, has all the power on his side.
When milk prices shoot up as some say will happen, at least Obama will not have caved. When extended unemployment ends, Obama will not have caved.
The banker is an example of how the nation should operate politically, never cave because the law is on your side. The cabbie is also an example: he has the public’s support because he didn’t win because he did not cave and sought to exact a price on the banker.
Both losers, but they did not cave!