
Cory Booker and Mark Zuckerberg
It started on Oprah.
Facebook founder and Winklevii nemesis Mark Zuckerberg announced a $100 million donation to Newark schools to blunt PR damage from the release of The Social Network help school children. The money would not be going into the struggling city’s budget but would be privately controlled with Newark Mayor Cory Booker providing guidance.
Yes, money used to transform Newark public schools would be administered privately and, until recently, in secret from the people of Newark.
Privatizing schools in Newark was already a tough task this year after the crown jewel of charter schools in the city was caught up in a cheating scandal. Apparently telling teachers they get paid more/remain employed if their students do better on tests leads to gaming the test system – who knew monetary incentives lead to the pursuit of self-interest? The strategy was clear, use the private money to launch attacks on public schools and keep anyone from seeing how.
That last part of the strategy just hit the wall. The American Civil Liberties Union won a lawsuit forcing the release of emails between Mayor Booker and Facebook executives:
NEWARK – A Superior Court judge has ordered the City of Newark to release emails that were exchanged about the $100 million pledge that Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg made to Newark schools in September 2010.
The ruling was issued in response to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey (ACLU-NJ) on behalf of the Secondary Parent Council (SPC), a group of Newark parents and grandparents seeking more transparency about the donation.
There is an interesting twist here as the Booker administration originally claimed there were no emails.
The city originally stated it did not have any documents about the donation. It later admitted in a January court hearing that emails existed, but argued they did not have to release them because they were shielded by mayoral executive privilege, contain personal information and are deliberative in nature. The city also argued Newark Mayor Cory Booker was not acting in his official capacity as mayor when he accepted Zuckerberg’s pledge on the Oprah Winfrey show.
Judge Rachel N. Davidson rejected all those arguments, noting for instance that a press release on the City of Newark’s own website touts Booker’s involvement in the donation as mayor and that all of the emails in dispute are maintained by Booker’s executive assistant in Newark City Hall. The judge also noted that Booker’s role as mayor is repeated in statements about the donation that are mentioned on his campaign website, as well as in some of the emails that are being sought.
As for the emails themselves they show the typical anxieties and pathologies of corporate executives and politicians when embarking on any hostile takeover, as reported by The Wall Street Journal:
In the days leading up to the announcement of a $100 million gift to Newark schools Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg and Newark officials identified three areas that could be hurdles to a smooth implementation: building community support, attracting other donors and hiring a new superintendent…
A week before the September 2010 donation was public, Sandberg asked Booker in an email about spending plans for the first 100 days and details of how the mayor planned to obtain support from residents.
Booker wrote: “This is one of our biggest concerns right now as we must be ahead of the game on community organizing by next week.” A mayoral adviser outlined a rough plan to spend $315,000 on efforts such as polling, focus groups, mailing and consultants. The foundation has spent at least $2 million on such efforts since.
Newark residents who are critical of Booker at school board meetings often say they are wary of outsiders and would rather have a superintendent who has some connection to the city. Sandberg appears to have been concerned about how the gift would be viewed. In an email to Booker and other Newark officials, she wrote that a draft of a press release about the donation used “too much ‘national’ language.”
“I wonder if we should basically make this focused on Newark with just a touch of ‘and this will be a national model,’” she wrote.
The irony is rich – even the corporate executive trying to market philanthropy for brand benefit thinks the plan is not local enough. If only Sandberg knew Booker was getting ready to ditch Newark for higher office, then maybe she would realize it was never about Newark and all about Cory Booker sucking up to his donors on Wall Street.





28 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Great post.
Hopefully one of the journalists hosting Booker on the “all Cory, all the time” tour will ask him why he thought the $100 million given to
destroyNew Jersey schools is his personalbountybusiness, and not a matter for public scrutiny.He’s just another phony Democrat. Just goes to show that, despite his “hero” persona, Booker holds his Newark constituents in contempt.
Gee, he seemed so inventive and sincere on Rachel M., talking on about gun violence. Good actor like Obama I guess. Wonder if this revelation will help crater his career. One can only hope.
He’s a superb pitch man. But he needs a friendly platform where he won’t be asked probing questions in order to pull off the act. Hopefully interviewers will become more skeptical in the future.
This is excellent news. Good on the ACLU, and poop up on “Democrats” with “inspiring life stories” who, in the end, are just contemptible corporate suck-ups.
You nailed it. As a NJ resident, I can say that my impression is that Booker is the next Obama starting his climb.
That’s why you can’t take anything on MSDNC at face value, they seem like intelligent knowledgable people, but they are selling the Corporatist Party’s (D) brand 24/7.
As for the vacuous, amoral, darling of the top 10% Booker, he’s another example of politics attracting the mediocre and venal. He is obviously being groomed to follow Shrillary in Slick Willie, and Barry’s mold.
Eh? Yet another reason to loath, detest & despise Zuckerberg & his CIA-friendly Facebook. Figures.
And ditto for Booker. What a shill. No doubt Booker is highly compensated for his sell-out of the 99% in Newark NJ.
I don’t have a tv, so I’ve thankfully “missed” witnessing any of Booker’s “pitches” on MSNBC. No loss, thankfully.
And none of that $2 million spent on p.r. helps Booker’s personal political ambitions?
Perhaps Booker should take note of the Massachusetts case involving former Massachusetts State Treasurer Tim Cahill.
Cahill ran for Governor as an Independent. His Republican opponent claimed that Cahill had mismanaged the lottery. Cahill’s campaign spent money rebutting that. No problem there.
However, then Treasurer Cahill also had the state lottery defend itself, at its own expense, saying how well run it was. The ads were not about Cahill–never mentioned his name–and could be run today as p.r. for the lottery. Nonetheless, Massachusetts prosecuted Cahill for allegedly spending state money to further his personal political ambitions and not the lottery’s interests.
Cahill was neither acquitted nor convicted. Rather, there was a hung jury.
And, IMO, Cahill’s actions were a lot more defensible than Booker’s.
Meanwhile, what was Zuckerberg thinking in not giving the money to the state? He could still have stipulated that Booker be the one to make the decisions about how the money was spent.
I totally agree that we need him to be interviewed by someone who will ask probing questions. Sadly, I cannot imagine which media source with an significant-sized audience that might be.
I don’t think even Fox would be too tough on a Mayor who rushed into a burning home to rescue people. Especially not one who is so gung ho for charter schools.
I think even Fox would wait to see if he wins the Democratic Presidential nomination before lighting into him.
There is always Fox which caters to the far right wingnuts and the far left manic progressives when it comes to Democrat bashing…
Unfortunately your’re right. MSNBC is a DINO’s weak sister answer to Faux news. Ed Schultz is blatant in his man love of Obama while Rachel M. is more nuanced her pro Obama screeds.
Hell of a story, thanks for telling it, DSW . . . rcc’d.
Booker is the lowest form of political opportunist, as bad as Obama. Where’s that factory where they churn out these scumbags.
Good article here:
Cory Booker: The Second Coming of Obama – Only Worse
” The Lords of Capital have more than one Great Black Hope. “If there had been no Barack Obama, Cory Booker would have been Wall Street’s choice as the First Black President.” Newark’s mayor is fiercely loyal to his friends in the ruling class. “One thing Cory Booker cannot abide is anyone bad-mouthing his rich people.”
…
http://blackagendareport.com/content/cory-booker-second-coming-obama-only-worse
Glen Ford is a must read on Booker.
For any who have the time, I highly recommend watching his presentation on Booker, Newark, and the agenda being pursued.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdPACwRgw04
Zuckerberg is the babyface of the Elite NWO. Everything he touches is a scandalous abuse.
Thanks DS, I’m going to watch that later.
Booker was in my “most progressive” town four years ago coinciding with the Obama (S)election and all manner of white and black libs-progressives (allDem Party faithful) were in full blown adulation mode. After his talk, wow is he an obvious ego maniac, I tried to engage many of them with facts about who he was, his funders and so forth. Folks were not interested in hearing any of this, their minds were made up. Same story with Obama.
Now most of them skulk around muttering they were fooled or “we had no other choice” or claim to be “done with politics.”
Glen ford exposed the extent of Corey’s history of selling public assets to the plutocrats in this revealing presentation. there’s something deeply disturbing when Booker uses the impoverished circumstances of his people in Newark to sell off their schools to billionaires. Booker is so confident of his wonderfulness to realize the robber baron class holds him in deep contempt.
http://blackagendareport.com/content/glen-ford-corporate-assault-public-education.
Good work
So, TBogg, you consider the reasonable and rational concerns these comments raise about Cory Booker to be “bashing”?
You who have called commenters here, “retards” among other ad hominen assaults?
You who have said of your blog (and, presumably, you include FDL AND the “representational” political “process”) … “This is not a democracy it is a business”?
TBogg, your knee-jerk legacy party prejudice and your arrogant presumed sense of “entitlement”, of being “permitted” to attack anyone, here, whom you choose, even on the posts of others, is showing.
Jimbo’s link, @14, to Black Agenda Report, and jcgrim’s @ 18, you probably regard as “bashing” or even as “hating”, while many of the rest of us consider it to be fair and honest warning.
For that matter, TBogg, much as it discomfits you, Firedoglake is a superb information source, with a number of front-pagers, MY FDL posters, and informed commenters willing to examine Obama’s, rhetoric, policies, the violent, destructive “military” behavior which Obama has expanded and fully condones, and his deliberate, cynical attacks on the poor and the marginalized in this nation through the destruction of the social safety net as well, although these programs have NOTHING to do with the fictitious “fiscal cliff” which Obama has sought diligently to “create” and the words and deeds of other members of the Democratic “misleadership” class, in depth, in context, and with a perspective most useful to many of the rest of us … You call it “bashing”, I term it necessary truth,the truth we must have to set ourselves free of tyranny, to rebuild civil society and resurrect the Rule of Law.
Thank you, Dan Wright, your posts are very, very much appreciated
DW
Boggy sees a hater in every tree and behind every bush.
The poor guy pees in his pants and then starts yelling at whoever is walking by.
Here’s a must read on Cory Booker:
Fruit Of The Poisoned Tree: The Hard Right’s Plan To Capture Newark NJ
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/fruit-poisoned-tree-hard-rights-plan-capture-newark-nj
“phony” is unwanted – Democrats are phony.
Yep, BAR is an excellent source which tracks the Black misleadership class.
DSWright,
Recommended.
Although, I can’t see into the mind of Senator Menendez, and yet, he must be enjoying a “quiet” laugh since Menendez was accused of various political ‘violations’ for not genuflecting to the Wall Street Crowd. And unfortunately, for me at least, Menendez still won’t create a Progressive Caucus in the Senate. Of course, a “senator” Booker wouldn’t deign to acknoweldge the need for a Progressive Caucus. It would ‘cramp’ his hand.
Jaango
That won’t happen here because FOX approves of Booker’s goals — and they really like him since he won’t run against Christie.
Now, if he suddenly decided to turn into the next Paul Wellstone, they’d turn on him faster than lightning.
He does have a point in that FOX does have a habit in attacking Democrats, namely effective ones, who are seen as a threat to conservative goals. Cory Booker, however, is not in this category.
Who do you, PW, consider to be these Democrats, these “effective ones”?
And what, precisely, constitutes proof or example OF their effectiveness?
Can it be that there are so many that you cannot begin to list them?
Frankly, I should much appreciate knowing who, among the Democrats, we can reliably count upon to support the Rule of Law and the Constitution, who are “effective” in their support of the middle class and the poor, who support the role of Congress to declare war and who are willing to insist that Congress MUST engage in honest and continuous oversight of the expanding unitary Executive.
Truly “effective” champions of justice and truth, stalwart supporters of ensuring that the people KNOW what is done in the name of the people, are so rare, today, as to be exceptional and they deserve to be recognized and fully appreciated.
I look forward to your naming currently serving politicians and candidates who consistently display actual and meaningful “effectiveness”.
Thank you, in advance, PW.
DW