Despite new regulations and outright promises from CEO Lloyd Blankfein, Goldman Sachs is once again engaging in proprietary trading. A practice that lead to a $550 million fine from the SEC when Goldman Sachs mislead clients in order to promote its own accounts. The solution under Dodd-Frank to this behavior was the Volker Rule but now it seems Goldman Sachs is prop trading anyway:
Sitting onstage in Washington’s Ronald Reagan Building in July, Lloyd C. Blankfein said Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) had stopped using its own money to make bets on the bank’s behalf.
“We shut off that activity,” the chief executive officer told more than 400 people at a lunch organized by the Economic Club of Washington, D.C., slicing the air with his hand. The bank no longer had proprietary traders who “just put on risks that they wanted” and didn’t interact with clients, he said.
That may come as a surprise to people working in a secretive Goldman Sachs group called Multi-Strategy Investing, or MSI. It wagers about $1 billion of the New York-based firm’s own funds on the stocks and bonds of companies, including a mortgage servicer and a cement producer, according to interviews with more than 20 people who worked for and with the group, some as recently as last year. The unit, headed by two 1999 Princeton University classmates, has no clients, the people said.
While Wall Street has been diligently working to undermine the Volker Rule through lobbying it is not clear if this secretive unit at Goldman cleverly sneaks through a loophole that was inserted into the original bill regarding long-term investing or just outright violates the law.
The team’s survival shows how Goldman Sachs has worked around regulations curbing proprietary bets at banks. Former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul A. Volcker singled out the company in 2009, saying it shouldn’t get taxpayer support if it focuses on trading. A section of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act known as the Volcker rule, drafted to prevent banks from taking on excessive risk, limits short-term investments made with firms’ capital…
Their team at Goldman Sachs has bet against companies through short selling, or the sale of borrowed securities, and while investments are supposed to last for months they sometimes end early, according to half a dozen former members.
“MSI is very much like a hedge fund,” said Ashkan Marsh, 30, who worked for the unit before leaving the firm in 2008.
Goldman Sachs, the fifth-biggest U.S. bank by assets, doesn’t report on the holdings or performance of MSI, or of the Special Situations Group in which it’s housed.
Maybe after the next crash we can have real Wall Street Reform.
Photo by Asa Mahat | Fortune Live Media under Creative Commons license





28 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
“Maybe after the next crash we can have real Wall Street Reform.”
Barnum was right.
“Maybe after the next crash we can have real Wall Street Reform.”
Reform will never happen without a crash, which is why I advocated letting the last one happen, and opposed the bailouts.
Let’s just get it over with.
every time i hear that the DOW has a +/- 100+ point change, i think “gold sacks’ computers just added more to the execs’ bonus fund.” ;o(
Goldman Sachs doesn’t disclose how much it makes from commodities trades, nor does it announce how much it makes from “commodity market manipulation” when the poor were robbed as a result of the manipulated prices of food and gas. Goldman Sachs is all over the place.
They STILL gamble with our money and they get the winnings and we get stuck with the losses.
What a country.
Yakov Smirnoff
Why is this man smiling???????
NOW we know.
Did anyone expect that a “savvy businessman” would pay attention to ANY law or regulation in relation to his business?
Considering the penalties assessed so far for their bad behavior why would they stop? If you let someone steal a few hundred billion and they only have to pay a 2% fine as the punishment you can be sure they’ll be back
Nailed it.
Corrupt investors invest with corrupt Bankers who get insurance from corrupt insurance company based on ratings from corrupt rating agency and then get bailed out by corrupt Government essentially run by corrupt investors. Syllogism for the collapse of world economy.
Got that right….
They are no better tan drug addicts or hoarders…
Oh, they’s paying more penalties than that to keep the compradors in line.
But still, PROFIT!
Welcome to the new world order, comrade.
Maybe after the crash we can have Blankfein’s and Obama’s heads on pikes.
Reform never happens unless there is conflict. Take slavery for instance, people exploited for the energy they couldn’t invest in themselves? So much for opportunity. Sad reality is humans are subordinate to corporations .who control government to advance a self interest, hoarding, a pathological condition..
Unless GS. Can get investment opportunities rated AAA and dump it while playing the short?
That is it in a nutshell; in a Country of laws that is called FRAUD and you go to jail for doing it but here it is called “they did nothing illegal” and we look FORWARD.
Law ain’t what you think it is.
Wars never happen unless there is conflict.
So which way do ya think this shite is going, ummm, comrade?
Hear hear.
And what’s gonna happen to Blankfein & Goldman SUCKS???
Why: nada nada enchilada
But hey youse serf: doncha smoke nonna dat dere maryjane or youse goin’ ta da Big House, stat!
Got it? Thought so.
A little hypocrisy is a necessary thing in the theater of power.
You’d be smiling, too, if you were completely immune from real consequences no matter what you did.
I think ou have hit the nail squarely on the head.
Whole scenario does not bode well for us in the 99%.
THose crazy bankin’ peoples. Like “wack-a-mole”. Close one bankin’ loophole, they invent another one. And we, the people, are always one step behind them. And worse, the SEC and the DOJ are right along side of them declaring they did nothing illegal or, if they did, assessing menial fines for their thievery. Fines inevitably paid by the shareholders, NOT the actual crooks.
My friend, Danny, a conspiracy buff, used to talk to me about the “International Banking Conspiracy” and the Bilderbergers or whatever. I used to tell him was crazy. Not any longer.
Operative word “crazy”. It didn’t work the first time so lets do it again.
Yea, ‘cept there’s lots more people wrapped up in that conspiracy than could have been believed.
I think we need to revise a George Carlin quote: “it’s called the American delusion because you have to be crazy to believe it.”
What a *yawn* shock.
I thought Dodd Frank *giggle* had taken care of everything.
And we get this news as Obama is appointing Lew to replace Geithner?
How ridiculous do things have to get?
Hmmm…
– Proprietary trading had nothing to do with the fine/settlement from the SEC. If anything that was about favoring one client over another
- Goldman is not violating the law with this trading because the Volcker rule has not been finalized. Most banks are winding down their proprietary trading operations to conform with what they *think* the law is going to be.
- Even if the Volcker rule was in effect Goldman is not violating it or exploiting a loophole – they are complying with it. The law says they have to usually have to hold positions for longer than X days and that is exactly what they are doing (there are exceptions allowed – no one expects a bank to hold on to the stock of a company that’s about to go bankrupt)
This is also a fairly small operation. The unit’s total assets represent about 0.1% of Goldman’s balance sheet.