The hits keep on coming for the NRA.
Responding to the Sandy Hook School shooting Wayne LaPierre, CEO of the NRA, proposed a program to immediately put armed guards in every school. LaPierre placed an emphasis on getting “good guys” with guns inside schools as soon as possible.
A charter school (of course) followed the NRA’s advice and hired a firearms instructor to help protect their students.
A prosecutor in Lapeer, Michigan says, “No harm, no foul,” after a charter school took the National Rifle Association’s (NRA) advice and hired a armed security guard who promptly left his handgun unattended in a student bathroom.
Chatfield School co-directors Matt Young and Bill Kraly announced last week that they had hired retired Lapeer County Sheriff’s Dept. firearms instructor Clark Arnold as a security guard in response to the December mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut.
“It’s a tremendous asset to the safety of our students,” Young told WNEM in a report that aired on Tuesday.
Perhaps the “flooding the zone” strategy regarding guns in schools might be a little flawed. Maybe guns are better left elsewhere and getting them out of rather than in schools is a better idea.





10 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
It also might help if the “guards” have an IQ higher than their hat size. It’s just crazy.
Typical.
I’m wondering why the human race hasn’t evolved to a higher state that could prevent us from producing republicans in congress.
I’m so sick of those bastards.
This is good news, actually. I expected the first incident of a an armed guard at a school misbehaving would be armed rape of a child or some such horror. Nevertheless, it sure didn’t take long for an armed guard to screw the f up, did it?
Well, THAT didn’t take long …..
If the aliens are watching us, they must be laughing their tentacles off…
I figured it’d be a kid shooting another kid accidentally. I had pretty much pegged the idea that schools didn’t really have the means to keep the guns away from kids since the “plan” requires that guns be readily available rather than locked up out of reach.
Luckily whichever kid found it was mature enough just to return and report it happening rather than holding an impromptu show and tell for his classmates complete with demonstrations.
This is the thing. Depressed and fearful gun owners, (often) out of work, sitting around in their underwear drunk on Camo High Gravity Lager, cleaning their guns for nothing better to do while the rugrats sniff around. . . playfully sighting on their wives when they gripe about the dirty dishes/trash needing to be taken out/phone bill
while Colt executives drive home in their Lexuses, looking forward to that first martini.
All right, everybody. Let’s fan out and start looking for those bullets.
http://youtu.be/z1ttYoQ8W1E
Well. So here’s the(first)answer to the oft-posed question: What could go wrong?
There being too much to our present
experience to ignore as regards
personal theory reflected below, I’ve
decided to retain the reference; but,
there is absolutely no spam.
On the one hand if I were a pro police
state control freaky sort of person,
which is to say a paranoid (all knowingly
sort of judgemental person) or someone
desparately needing to mollify myself over
something or desparately needing to deflect
blame from my own nefarious activity, I’d
welcome shoot-ups in grammar schools
cause even Hitler didn’t militarize
grammar schools.
On the other hand, guns have to be
something clung to desparately by masculine
insecure obnoxious paranoid clowns.
They have to be the world’s most obvious
phallic symbol.
I’ve so far failed finding a way to not use the
witch-hunt word or thesis.
But I mean no ill-will, having come from atheist to
pretty much being convinced information enjoys multiple
stages of life, for one thing, and even that there just might
be some real validity to this theory as regards there being
a conveyed lesson wherein it is intended for us to understand
the conceptualizations of freedom/equality/love as living
beings are meant to be taken seriously and in terms of their
being able to show themselves in different manners.
In a nutshell, simply to quickly explain the seeming contradiction,
I theorize that after a date East/West are morally identical per plan,
with the West admonished not to judge but having embarked on that
anyway.
WItch-hunt enables judging to control and enslave, and originally for
ancient despots to rumble with their neighbors and have other men’s
women.
Imagine a rich person switching out monopoly for capitalism and his
cohorts shouting demon-like labels at anyone not concurring.
THAT DEFINES THE PROCESS OF CONFLATING
SOCIOPATHY WITH FALSE GOOD MORALITY.
That formula led to the process-self-creation of a ruling class so
steeped in witch-hunt but also by that process genetically so
infused with gay genetics, with them being the hypocritical
gays now finally believably foreseen, with gays otherwise utterly,
utterly normal, even optimally occurring, that said class has
grown drunk on deception and profit from fraud.
Fear having been their own would-be legacy for their own
families, but transferred, literally into a system of
‘Government by Transference,” they further bring a
resentment to their deception and profit from fraud.
The process of the community that springs forth witch-hunt
is about everything having nothing to do with
love.
Just as was described to have been the case during
earlier moments of history similar to our present experience,
this ruling class is a class of inadequates–both psychologically
from emotional deprivations and physically, most likely.
The witch-hunter is definitionally homicidally paranoid,
paranoia being Greek for all knowing. The fat witch-hunter,
self-limited by such things as voluntary obesity lest
he, to his self limiting thinking, be wrongly demonized,
will thus be: fat; impotent; inadequate; ruled by a God
complex; likely a product of a father lacking in his own
recognition, likely a product of a mother more interested
in making people afraid of being demonized than affording
affection to her children.
DISCLAIMER:
NOTHING KNOWN OF THE PSYCHE OF ANYONE
IDENTIFIED/IDENTIFIABLE OR OF ANY OF THEIR
RELATION(S.)
OPINION. SUPPOSITION. THEORY.
ALSO REFLECTS OPINION, SUPPOSITION, THEORY AS
TO EVENTS OR ACTIONS REGARDING OR CAUSED BY
SAID EXPRESS OR IMAGINABLE PERSONS OR THEIR
RELATIONS.
WITH THIS DISCLAIMER AT THIS POINT, ADD:
I INTEND FOR NOTHING HERE TO REFLECT/IDENTIFY/RELATE TO
ANY ACTUAL PERSON, AND I DISCLAIM THE ABILITY FOR IT TO
DO SO, FOR I CAN NOT POSSIBLY HAVE ACTUAL KNOWLEDGE
IN SUCH REGARDS AS THE SUBJECT MATTERS IDENTIFIED.
EVEN IF ONE CAN IMAGINE SUCH PERSON(S) I CANNOT
KNOW THE VALIDITY OF ANY RUMOR OR PUBLICITY AS TO
SAID PERSON. I CAN ONLY HAVE LESS KNOWLEDGE OF
THE CHARACTER OR OTHER NATURE OF ANY RELATION(S)
OF SAID PERSON, AND ANY/ALL STATEMENTS AS TO WHAT
ONE MIGHT EXPECT IN THAT REGARD
ENTIRELY REFLECT PERSONAL
THEORY/SUPPOSTION/OPINION.
That would be the logical candidate for the blowhard with the
suitcase full of Viagra telling women what they can’t do.
That would be the cops denying birthright and freedom/equality/love
with gratuitous severe punishment, and they would be deliberately
understood as such by that ruling class.