Good evening, all!
International Developments
❖ “UN to examine UK and US drone strikes: Strikes will be studied to assess extent of any civilian casualties, identity of militants targeted and legality of actions.”
❖ “Days after the deadly hostage crisis in Algeria, Britain, Germany and the Netherlands on Thursday warned of an imminent threat to Westerners in neighboring Libya and urged their citizens to leave the eastern city of Benghazi.”
❖ “‘Getting Worse’: Egypt’s gays fear government crackdown”
International Finance
❖ They wanted to hide, but a British judge has ordered release of the names of Barclays “ex CEOs Bob Diamond and John Varley and current Finance Director Chris Lucas . . . alongside traders linked to a probe into rate fixing”, Libor. (Cannot resist: one of the other names is Rich Ricci.)
❖ Morgan Stanley’s most toxic asset was called “Nuclear Holocaust”, “Shitbag” and other tender names. Since the US Dept of Justice and the Securities and Exchange Commission “have failed to hold big wrongdoers to account,” the onus fell to a Taiwanese Bank, resulting in “Hundreds of pages of internal Morgan Stanley documents” being released, revealing much.
❖ “Racing To The Revolution: Spain Vs Greek Youth Unemployment”–now at 55%.
Money Matters USA
❖ Great Glenzilla run-down of the Dept of Justice’s failures (including Lanny Breuer) to investigate and prosecute the banksters, with great quotes from keen observers and critics. More from Emptywheel.
❖ While Obama has nominated “U.S. attorney Mary Jo White, who built a reputation prosecuting white-collar crimes, to lead the Securities and Exchange Commission, an agency that has a central role in implementing Wall Street reform”, Yves Smith’s concerns remain.
❖ Stiglitz and Bilmes: “No US peace dividend after Afghanistan: Bad decisions exact a high price”. $700bn spent on a war that will produce enormous growth in “costs of disability and healthcare benefits for recent war veterans”, 800,000 of whom are already “receiving government medical care”. Veterans Affairs budget: “$140bn this year from $50bn in 2001.” Much more.
Politics USA
❖ “[E]ight members of the ruling class” sent a letter to Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA), Chair of the Senate Intelligence Committee, extolling John Brennan who has been nominated as CIA head. As this article delineates, “You’ll be amazed at what they left out.”
❖ Highlights from John Kerry’s appearance before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee today. Here and here.
❖ “Reid and McConnell reach tentative deal to change filibuster rules” which leaves “liberal Democrats unsatisfied.” Response to critics of the deal from an anonymous Senate staffer.
❖ Garry Wills on “Dumb America”: The South’s response to its Civil War loss “improved its literature, but impoverished other things.” Such as, today’s South’s willindness “to cut off its own nose to show contempt for the government”, “The South has decided to be defeated and dumb.” More.
❖ VA Republicans have pushed a bill through a committee that “would allocate the state’s electoral votes based on who wins each congressional district”, not on who wins the state. “FairVote executive director Rob Richie described the Virginia plan as ‘an incredibly unfair and indefensible proposal’”. (Following Richie’s testimony, PA Republicans backed down on a similar plan.)
Gun Corner
❖ Sen. Joe Manchin (D-WV), a member of the NRA, is working with them as well as Senate colleagues in developing a bill for “implementing universal background checks”.
❖ Tom Tomorrow: “N.R.A. Debate Tips“.
Health, Homelessness & Hunger
❖ Karen Lewis, President of the Chicago Teachers Union, on uninsured children: 9 million+ “children face the lions of poverty, addiction and neglect’ daily.
❖ Only a day after he said LA’s Medicaid hospice benefit would be axed February 1st, Gov. Bobby Jindal (R) has reversed course. State senators were quite opposed to the cut.
❖ That MA pharmacy responsible for “a nationwide meningitis outbreak paid out more than $70 million to its owners and their other companies in the last six years.”
Women & Children
❖ “More than 40% of reviewed cases of sexual assault reported to the police by [Washington, DC's] central hospital . . . ‘appear never to have been investigated’ or even documented by the [Metropolitan Police Department].” Video.
❖ Catholic Health Initiatives, a “faith-based system” though not owned by the Church itself, is arguing fetuses aren’t people–in court.
❖ “A Republican lawmaker in New Mexico introduced a bill on Wednesday [requiring] victims of rape to carry their pregnancies to term in order to use the fetus as evidence for a sexual assault trial.” End the pregnancy beforehand and get slapped with a 3rd degree felony for “tampering with evidence.” Don’t miss the “UPDATE”.
Education Directions
❖ Two bills before the AZ state legislature, one requiting all “public high school students . . . to recite an oath supporting the U.S. Constitution to be able to graduate” and the other requiring all 1-12 grade students to say the Pledge of Allegiance each day. (How come those kindergarteners get off so easy?)
❖ “The courageous action taken by teachers at Seattle’s Garfield High School has won growing support and admiration, not only from the city’s teachers, parents and students, but from teachers nationwide.” This Battle in Seattle is over the “disastrous testing-madness policies . . . under No Child Left Behind and Race To The Top.”
Working for A Living
❖ There’s a Wal-Mart warehouse in Mira Loma, CA that workers struck last September over working conditions. Last week, CalOSHA fined the warehouse operator and a staffing agency $60,000 “for putting wokers in danger” at the warehouse.
❖ Unionists “gathered over the weekend at the Labor Campaign for Single-Payer conference in Chicago, [knowing] that if universal health care is ever to be achieved in the US, labor must play a key role in pushing for it”. See Karen Lewis’ presentation at “Health, Homelessness & Hunger”, above.
Heads Up!
❖ “‘Gideon’s Army’ follows a group of young public defenders in the Deep South who contend with low pay, long hours and staggering caseloads to represent the poor.” Video.
❖ ”The Long Slog to Legalizing Marijuana in the U.S. Is Just Beginning”.
❖ George Soros has joined Guatemalan President Perez Molina’s effort to shift discussion to “a regulatory approach to drugs, rather than the extremes of a full-blown war on drugs or a policy of liberalisation.” Soros noted at Davos that “Drug policy has endangered political stability and security in many countries [and that] incarceration is hugely expensive”.
Planet Earth News
❖ “Massive melting of Andes glaciers: Glaciers in the tropical Andes have shrunk by 30-50% since the 1970s”. Millions depend on those glaciers for water.
❖ “After years of gain”, deforestation is back in the Brazilian Amazon rainforest. Video.
❖ Maine’s Public Utility Commission ok’d Norway’s Statoil “to build a $120 million deepwater wind turbine demonstration project in the Gulf of Maine.”
❖ Despite what we read about the “Coal Renaissance” in Europe, “The truth is coal’s future in the EU is bleak. Here’s what’s happening.”
Mixed Bag
❖ Who knew? “Dung Beetles Navigate Via the Milky Way, An Animal-Kingdom First”
❖ Remember those faked moon landings?
Break Time




46 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
January 24, maybe?
Re: #1
I wondered the same. . .
And is Stiglitz out and about? Fatster pointed that way at the end of the last Roundup just as it was fading (#33 at 5 PM)
When the messed up situation is finally through slapping the majesty of the blues to the ground and giving the dark joy of the spirituals inside-out puckerface, there still remain —— show tunes!!
Yes, my third typo of the week–sheez!
But Europe has fewer young people in the job market. They have apprentice programs and free higher education. So probably, or possibly, the youth unemployment is worse in the USA. A couple million in the military helps out, though. Europe doesn’t have that.
Oh, that was wonderful–another great trip down memory lane. Many thnx, prostratedragon.
But it’s not so bleak elsewhere. According to ThinkProgress Coal Could Surpass Oil As World’s Top Energy Source By 2017.
55% of the youth in the US are not unemployed. Latest figure was 17%.
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/12/27/youth-unemployment-in-the-eurozone.aspx
The inquiry will report to the UN general assembly in New York this autumn. How many innocent men, women and children will be arbitrarily assassinated by Obama in the meantime? The rule of law guy? haha
China loves it. Great smog contributor.
http://www.nationmaster.com/graph/ene_coa_con-energy-coal-consumption
http://factsanddetails.com/china.php?itemid=392
Did you read my #5?
Might help if I cleaned my glasses, ya think?
Pas de quoi — everything old is new these days.
Senator Feinstein introduced a new “Assault Weapons Ban of 2013” The legislation bans the sale, transfer, manufacturing and importation of:
Also a High-Capacity Magazines Bill To Be Introduced By Democrats On First Day Of Congressional Session
Perhaps the magazine bill is intended to head off Feinstein’s bill?
Much does tend to come around again, doesn’t it, prostratedragon? I was thinking about this song, thanks to you,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Uy8cyVWU2A
Regarding Stiglitz & Bilmes. . .
It’s always worth being scolded again and again. Wars are expensive in so many ways, and the residue sticks for so long. The potential costs never seem to compute beforehand.
Earlier today I got deftly scolded twice about our how I view our costly habit. Responses #30 and #31 at
http://news.firedoglake.com/2013/01/23/the-roundup-for-january-23-2013/#comments
The first (#30) had to do with my recalling Eisenhower approvingly as he warned, long ago, about the military industrial complex. But mafr has plenty of objection to Eisenhower’s nuclear buildup, those costs and dangers. I’d agree with that, especially about the dangers. But I still credit Ike with his more generic warning about the wiles of money to be made by anyone with something, anything, to sell to defense. My point was that part hasn’t changed, rather than a broad endorsement of Ike and everything he did. Yet I grew up during the nuke proliferation, it was out of control, and as a kid I was scared by it like the dickens.
The other objection (#31) was from DW. I think there’s a dismissal of my contention that a huge standing military, and hence conscription, had become obsolete. I don’t disagree with DW that Iran, East Asia, the ME, etc. are horrific problems. I just don’t think in a conflict nowadays that a mid 20th century response would be in the offing — that is, a superpower army seizing and controlling wide swaths of territory and breaking everything. Also DW sees a need for a robust military force, hints at a National Service mandate, I think, with a military option as one path. If that’s correct I doubt an actual draft could be part of it. The lack of a draft nowadays certainly doesn’t cause public “approval” of endless US intervention and warfare; however, I’d bet reinstituting a draft would turn countless numbers against that stance. That’s what I recall from the Vietnam era.
Good, thoughtful points, maa8722. I’ll be sure to check in tomorrow am and “eavesdrop” on the conversation. Very interesting.
Guess that’s that!
Heard it again recently myself. Sometimes a little distance improves even what one knows is great.
WWMWS?
Good morning, fatster and everyone else.
I thought I might start the day with a bit of Black Agenda Report.
Before I share Glen Ford’s very interesting and, I consider, spot on article, I would like to share with all of you a wee bit of consternation.
I have no idea how the rest of you might think about this, but I find it rather appalling that the two most mentioned, so far, likely Democratic candidates “running” (or sticking their political toes in the water) for the office of President are … Hillary Clinton and Joseph Biden.
While some may be thrilled at this prospect, it seems to me that if these two are the very best that the Democrats may offer, neither of them “new blood”, but tired, old advocates of “more of the same” … then, given the cowardly behavior of Senate democrats, just yesterday, regarding the filibuster, it is well past time to consider, very seriously, that this nation, this society, and “the people”, are in rather desperate need of alternatives to BOTH legacy political parties.
With that thought in mind, I offer you this from BAR:
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/white-house-un-reality-show
Thank you all for the lend of your ears and your thoughtful consideration.
I hope that everyone may have a confirming and most pleasant day.
My very best, fatster, as always, to you.
DW
Thank you, fatster.
I am in awe of the work you put into these roundups, as well as your skill.
i don’t even have the words to say how well you do. Thanks.
❖ Garry Wills on “Dumb America”:
A lot of good comments on the article, which are along this line:
“As I matured, my travels and reading expanded, I see what I call “a redneck culture” pervasive in our country and not limited to any region or locale”
Fatster,
I think pointing out typos is somewhat rude, and quite pointless.
Ending ban on women in combat. Militarizing equality.
It may also be rude to point out that it’s rude.
it’s too early.
Fatster — I really enjoy your compendiums, they are so comprehensive and bring to my attention things I never see elsewhere. Thank you for all the effort you put in whilst assembling these posts.
I don’t comment often as it’s pre-coffee hereabouts, but today I wanted to take a moment to let you know how much I appreciate your work.
Teddy
re cost of nuclear weapons, it’s more expensive than many people may realize.
from waging Peace.org
“In the mid-1990s a group of researchers at the Brookings Institution did a study of US expenditures on nuclear weapons. They found that the US had spent $5.8 trillion between 1940 and 1996 (in constant 1996 dollars).
This figure was informally updated in 2005 to $7.5 trillion from 1940 to 2005 (in constant 2005 dollars). Today the figure is approaching $8 trillion, and that amount is for the US alone.
There are currently nine countries with a total of over 20,000 nuclear weapons, spending $105 billion annually on their nuclear arsenals and delivery systems. That will amount to more than $1 trillion over the next decade. The US accounts for about 60 percent of this amount.”
Eight Trillion dollars on nukes? America in ten years wasted about 6 trillion dollars during transportation. That .80 cents of every dollar thing on gas as well that .60 cents of every dollar thing using diesel fuel, etc squandered? Now, add into that the evaporation of 14 trillion dollars and we have an extermination event. Nice return on investment?
Yes I forgot two wars, oil to conduct war and tax breaks for the aristocrats?
Twenty eight trillion dollars so far? No wonder why we have to borrow money from China?
Servitude…..
That’s a great article, DW; thanks for the link.
I wonder what this will do to the Pentagon’s sexual assault numbers and how they’re planning on being able to sweep them under the rug?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/24/women-war-zone-combat-military-sexual-violence
I personally found the idea that women were non combatants fairly ridiculous especially in light of situations like Jessica Lynch where they were being shot at but conveniently being called “non combatants” so the armchair generals could feel all masculine however, I do think that there are some things that need to be looked at carefully. We already had the first infant born in a combat zone and we’re already looking at very disturbing numbers when it comes to sexual assault(particularly when you consider it is an underreported crime.) I wish they had something better than a we’ll just wing it attitude.
edit
Re: #28
Brookings figures are interesting, but it’s a single source nonetheless. I don’t recall numbers, myself, from when I was in SAC, early 70s, other than that the nuke program was not considered a large part of the Pentagon dollars wise. But then, that was SAC’s mantra, also a single source. Note, SAC was rolled into ACC some 20 years ago.
When looking at this there could be wildly diverging results depending on how one counts, and what one wants to find.
For example both the B-52 force and most fighters have had nuclear capability and could plausibly be counted in toto, dollar wise, if the goal were to demonstrate how much the nuke effort cost. But both weapons systems were actually used for delivering conventional weapons — and would have been built just for that purpose and substantially as they were, even if there had been no nuke program at all. Albeit the B-52s, 47s, 58s, had originally been conceived as nuke delivery platforms and performed nuke alert. But how much of that cost is to be tagged to the nuke program, and at what point would, say, B52 expenditures show up in the conventional column — when they began carrying iron bombs, and couldn’t even sit nuke alert anymore?
This is all opaque. We’ll never know, and neither does Brookings I’d bet, even for ongoing expenditures nowadays. There are too many moving parts and plenty of it isn’t publicly available to Brookings or anyone else (e.g., is what DOE spends to maintain the nukes known nowadays?). I wouldn’t believe any Pentagon budget figures (or DOE’s) out of hand especially when they could be manipulated one way or another to serve a purpose.
Still I think it’s long been obvious that overall defense spending is waaaay overboard regardless. That, alone, ought to be enough to begin the process of cutting back.
???
hi thanks, interesting.
I know that the amount requested by Obama for maintaining nuclear weapons, and developing new nuclear weapons, (which I understand is going on under Obama,) is known, I’ve seen it , it’s something like 60 billion dollars a year.
I just meant that eisenhower’s comment was accurate, but that he was responsible for some of the growth of the MIC.
That author I think it is Ira Chernus, mentioned that before the end of WW 2 weapons manufacturing wasn’t thought of as an industry, or a job creator in the USA anyway.
Amazing to think how the USA has changed since ww2, as far as having a fondness for war and weaponry is concerned. How did that happen?
I was just going to agree with you, yes, it is a very good article.
I have too many comments here right now.
Re: #35
I’m inclined to look at K Street, follow the money, and watch where they propose the dollars be spent to tailor political support, then look at individual Congresspersons.
It’s not just the DOD, either. DOD’s a convenient lightening rod due to its size and the nature of warfare. Maybe DOT, FAA could give us some surpriss as well.
Exactly. Sexual assault is currently an out-of-control epidemic in the services and even in the service academies. Putting females in remote locations with high-testosterone-driven males will only worsen it.
A secondary issue is the inability of females to function properly in the extreme rigors of infantry combat units, including heavy weight-bearing.
The good news is that the Army is dragging its feet on implementation and unless Obama starts a new combat initiative somewhere there will be no lives at risk, only the injuries to females resulting from the two factors I listed above.
and mafr @ 35. Thanks to both of you for this discussion of nukes. I checked out the wiki to refresh my very spotty memory (the “spots” turned out to be ok, but the gaps were far greater than I thought, lol). Everything was going to be improved immensely by nuclear power. Eisenhower had that Atoms for Peace program (a real doozy, with motivations still being explored), the Navy (remember Rickover?) was gung-ho nuclear-powered ships and so on. Nuclear power plants sprang up here and there. But there was always a small, though determined, opposition to the nukes and when Three-Mile Island happened in 1979, a shift in national opinion began gaining ground.
Again, thanks for prodding me to revisit that era–scary time it was, hiding under desks and such.
I trust you’ll forgive me for this one, prostratedragon.
Thanks ever so much for that link to the Black Agenda Report, DWB. One more of their excellent articles.
May you have a great weekend, too, as we continue our journey toward Spring.
The US initiated the Iran nuclear program under Atoms For Peace as illustrated here.
nixonclinbushbama, your “few” words resulted in a big, beamin’ smile here. Many thnx.
The US is in violation of the NPT (unlike Iran, which isn’t).
TREATY ON THE NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS
Signed at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968
Ratification advised by U.S. Senate March 13, 1969
Ratified by U.S. President November 24, 1969
U.S. ratification deposited at Washington, London, and Moscow March 5, 1970
Proclaimed by U.S. President March 5, 1970
Entered into force March 5, 1970
Article VI
Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.
LOL, mafr. Reading right over one’s own typos is fairly common, it seems. If people point them out, that does give me the opportunity to correct them.
And . . . Good Morning!
Well, Teddy Partridge, how wonderful to see you here! Thanks so much for your kind remarks and encouragement.