When Chinese Communist Party leader Deng Xiaoping formally embraced Neoliberalism in the late 70s it was the final victory for the right-wing within the party. What followed was an opening up of China to Western business for the presumed benefit of all. In reality, China would invert the Maoist principles of the cultural revolution to restructure the country under a system of State Capitalism. The Chinese State, organized and operated by the Communist Party of China, would run the country for its own profit with the Chinese people becoming the State’s property, slaves in effect.
Slave labor was very appealing to Western businesses and China soon became a major destination for the production facilities of multinational corporations. The enticement of extremely low wages and a government more than willing to use any means necessary to keep workers in line was too good to pass up even for the most vaingloriously progressive of companies. The shift of manufacturing facilities to China from Western States that could not offer slave labor wages or the kind of labor market stability State Terrorism provides meant that China would also become a leader in manufacturing innovation. Despite the horrendous conditions for the Chinese people the factories established in China would become the most efficient and profitable in the world. But amidst the “free” market enterprise system existed resistance.
The Foxconn plant in China, a major supplier to Apple and HP, would become a symbol for the brutal conditions Chinese workers faced and their resistance to those conditions. A wave of worker suicides at the plant forced outside media to report on the way Chinese workers were treated and lead to a minor backlash among consumers of Apple and HP products. It was bad press but not enough for corporate managers in America and elsewhere to concede a bad fiscal quarter in order to make reforms.
But now Foxconn workers are taking their destiny into their own hands. After workers protested in September Foxconn has agreed to allow a union vote.
Foxconn, the contract manufacturer whose biggest customer is Apple, is preparing genuinely representative labor union elections in its factories in China for the first time, a powerful sign of the changes in the workshop of the world demanded by an increasingly restive workforce.
This would be the first such exercise at a large company in China, where labor unions have traditionally been controlled by management and local government. Foxconn is the country’s largest private sector employer with 1.2m mainland workers…
The move is part of Foxconn’s attempts to tweak its manufacturing machine, which makes a large proportion of the world’s gadgets such as iPhones, tablets and computers, in response to frequent worker protests, riots, strikes and soaring labor costs. Beijing is also encouraging collective bargaining as a way to help contain the growing unrest.
This may be the first in a long series of steps the Chinese people take to break the chains of servitude and regain their dignity and freedom. Though a small victory it could lead to something more.
Photo by Steve Jurvetson under Creative Commons license





13 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Thought I accidentally clicked onto the Heritage Foundation website.
Heritage or rather their donors love the Chinese
slavelabor market.Good luck to our brothers and sisters in China. Hope that their Unionization efforts can take root. One wonders whether our so-called “unions” in Team USA will offer any support?
Someone remind when it was that they had the freedom they now might regain.
What an interesting little nexus in Marxism-Leninism. Is the Chinese Communist Party the vanguard party of the proletariat – educated cadre who provide leadership for the workers’ movement – or just the vanguard party of their own greedy little spawn?
I think the theme here is that the 1% is the same everywhere, no matter what ideology they profess to follow, n’est ce pas?
x2.
This piece and some of its commenters seem to suffer from the usual ahistorical premise that the countries that have been socialist (“Communist” to the rightwing propagandists) at one time or another since 1917 are to be compared meaningfully with Western-style democracy. There may or may not be a case for such a comparison with the Soviet Union/Russia and/or the East European countries between 1945 and 1990, but it has never been the case for China which has always had despotic governments. When, DSW, you call the workers in today’s China “slaves” do you mean to imply that they are worse off than were Chinese workers before 1949? Or before the death of Mao and the defeat of the “gang of four” by Deng’s faction in the late 1970s? In one or the other of these cases you may or may not be right, but your terminology does not help in deciding the case.
… X 2 … good comment … goes and gets to the middle
It’s why I chuckle somewhat at the idea of Americans being taught that Stalin was worse than Hitler whereas Peter the Great was a statesman who was a tad rough but otherwise well-meaning. Setting aside ideology, about the main difference between the two men, besides their origins and upbringing — Peter was of the Romanovs and Stalin was a Georgian cobbler’s son who nearly became a priest — was that Stalin didn’t have any of his own kids beaten to death as Peter had done to Crown Prince Alexei. Both men wanted to drag Russia into modernity, neither man was overly particular about how it was done.
That being said, it’s good to see that Chinese workers are actually organizing themselves. Democracy in the workplace is a good thing — we need some of it here as well.
It’s all show…good luck…
and @ 9.
I like your thoughts, o lady who rises from the ashes, and it also sounds like you have the nitty-gritty of East European history down better than I.
BTW there’s an update to my diary on the DC mayoral situation in case you’re interested.
China is a big place and the Chinese people sometimes have their own ideas. I will be interested to see how this plays out.