As we move into the second decade of war what little is left of our principles is being chipped away. In a white paper given to NBC News the Obama Administration asserts the right to kill Americans with no due process.
A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S…
[T]he confidential Justice Department “white paper” introduces a more expansive definition of self-defense or imminent attack than described by Brennan or Holder in their public speeches. It refers, for example, to what it calls a “broader concept of imminence” than actual intelligence about any ongoing plot against the U.S. homeland.
The white paper, if nothing else, is smoking gun evidence that Barack Obama has completely abandoned his 2008 campaign pledge to rein in executive power in wake of Bush Administration abuses – meet the new boss, same as the old boss. Though some close observes are pointing out that the white paper is not the actual memo(s) used to justify killings of Americans that have already taken place.
Also troubling is that, according to the white paper, the authority to kill American citizens without due process is not restricted to the President.
“The condition that an operational leader present an ‘imminent’ threat of violent attack against the United States does not require the United States to have clear evidence that a specific attack on U.S. persons and interests will take place in the immediate future,” the memo states.
Instead, it says, an “informed, high-level” official of the U.S. government may determine that the targeted American has been “recently” involved in “activities” posing a threat of a violent attack and “there is no evidence suggesting that he has renounced or abandoned such activities.” The memo does not define “recently” or “activities.”
According to the federal government an informed high-level government official can now kill an American citizen without due process. Yes, for those playing at home, this is what tyranny looks like.
So long constitution we hardly knew ye.




93 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
I’ll bet there’s another ‘white paper’ that authorizes killing americans within the US too. Why not? Why stop at the borders?
Posting on this blog is probably enough reason to be targeted. After all, I’m ‘involved’ in an ‘activity’ critical of US policy.
Don’t worry they can only justify killing you without a trial if its in self-defense. That’s why it isn’t assassination.
Luckily no one in the US government has ever lied about or exaggerated threats requiring self defense as a pretext for anything.
Worse than assumed guilty until proven innocent.
I guess that means that if I think somebody might do me harm I can blow them away.
Like someone tailgating you on the freeway? At 70+mph?
A stand your ground law for drones…
Since this is now Corporate America, and they paid for this, what is the benefit to them?
But…..
TBogg HEARTS dronez…..
So that if you ever effectively hinder them, you can be executed as an example to the rest of us to keep our mouths shut.
And people wonder why many Americans are armed to the teeth. This is exactly the reason(s) the Founders created the 2nd Amendment of the Constitution.
Might be prudent to question their slam dunk intelligence with some sort of judicial and Congressional over-site, given that fiasco called the Iraq War.
Hey, I’m 62. An easy target for an induced heart attack. Who’s to know? Besides, I think I saw a ‘high-level’ county animal control employee glaring at me a couple days ago and speaking into a wrist mic….
Oops.
A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S…
My guess is that the Administration is using the “public danger” clause in the 5th Amendment as justification. The bigger concern is how far will this justification be expanded? Drug dealers, domestic crimes that endanger the public, drunk driving, speeding? It appears that the due process rules of the 5th and 14th Amendments are in danger from this precedent.
5th Amendment
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.[1]
14th Amendment Section. 1
All persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
How did that work out with David Koresh (?)
I blame the “greatest generation” failure to confront the obvious coup back in ’63.
The government serves at the pleasure of the CIA now. secret memos justify this shit !
Obama is worse than Bush. Bush didn’t go around saying he could go around intentionally killing citizens without due process. Obama has gone more extreme than Bush on a number of things rather than merely perpetuating the status quo from Bush.
And everyone should turn in their guns, because we can trust the Government so much!! A government with a congress and senate that can’t even get a copy of the REAL WHITE PAPER!! And a President who wants to put “one of the authors af these white papers..or the executioner” in charge of the CIA.
And those warning most about Tyranny get jeered and Laughed at by Democrats! Called nut cases, and worse!
I just want to know..who decides what constitutes “Associated Force”. Is it one person? 10 persons? 20? Should they have to be elected persons? What the hell is Associated force? Typing on message boards? Questioning the president? Or Cobgress? Who defines Associated Force? That could be just about ANYTHING! Especially with the New definition of imminent!
And to think the new boss is the same as the old boss..is absurd..this boss is much much more dangerous!
Before they had to get you in a small plane or a weird car accident..or have you jump from a building..now..they can come get you..if they don’t like you or like what your opinions are..and just shoot you dead..with no sneaking..no coverup nessesary!!
And certainly with no Due Process!
I never thought it possible during the Bush years..but this so called Democrat scares me way more than Bush!
And I warned people about him in 2008.. As well as 2012…and I was laughed at by Democrats..as were anyone who knew this guy was equally or way worse than Bush!
His tyranny is not new..
And anyone turning their guns in is insane!
And I have never believed in guns ..but my opinions on them have changed drastically in the past years!
I lived through the LARiots…( what were called the Rodney King riots) most of Korea town was spared ..because the store owners were armed and stood their ground…those riots I believed from the first moments the Police were not convicted ..were incited by Papa Bush..and the Republican Mayor of LA ..for Papa Bush…because Bush was way behind in the Primary..and he needed Calif to win..especially Southern Calif..to this day..nothing has changed my opinion of how and why those riots were Incited!
I was not armed…and was in fear of my child’s life and mine as well!
Today would those riots be considered Associated Force?? Could drones be flown over any or all of us..and they just randomly shoot any of us down with immunity??
What’s in the White Papers we know nothing about? Congress knows nothing about!
And since when do we have so few that decide without due process who is guilty and who is not….I always believed..we the people..were the Government..how silly of me!! What a silly premise!!
Now we have God sitting In our White House..and maybe not just one god??
Anyone else notice lately the Pictures of Obsma..are just like what we pointed out about pictures of Bush..where it looks like he has a Halo over and around his head?? I have been seeing lots of it lately!!!
No the new boss isn’t the same as the old boss..this new boss is much more dangerous!!
Really? Then why does the Constitution define armed rebellion against the U.S. government as treason?
“..and you kids get offa my lawn!”
You’re completely undermining Obama’s “Kill Baby, Kill!” argument with something that actually requires proof and a judicial process, but for Obama the Constitution is just a piece of paper.
Is anyone surprised? I’m not.
In terms of the 2d Amend & bearing arms, etc: good luck with that. It *may* make sense some of the time in terms of “protecting” yourself, if it’s protection from other citizens, such as in armed invasions of your home.
In terms of “protecting” yourself against the US gubmint/coporations?? Good effen luck with that fantasy. US gubmint got so much firepower ‘n drones ‘n stuff that no matter if you grenades & rocket launchers, their dicks still be waaaaay the eff more gargantuan than your teeny weenie.
Just saying….
When the Bush Crime Syndicate pushed for Unitary Exec “Privileges” this was the KNOWN outcome. If it wasn’t Obama doing this, it would just be another puppet having his stings pulled by the Secret Ones.
Conservatives were in blissful joy to have Booosh have these powers. Some Democratic voters are now in blissful joy to have Obama have these powers. Where’s YOUR pom-pom??? Yay Team! /s
Brought to US by 911 and the “Patriot Act”.
Alberto Gonzales and John Yoo ride again!
Most Obamabots would reject these findings soundly, even if the “memo” were shoved in their faces.
Plus “everyone knows” FDL is a lefty hotbed
yes, exactly. You can collect the greatest weapon arsenal you can, but if the government wants you dead, you’re dead. Which makes me laugh at the 2nd ammendment crazies. It’s beyond meaningless having weapons to use against the US government. You can line up a pop warner 6th grade football team against the Baltimore Ravens and they’d both have offenses and defenses and quarterbacks and they can play a game. We pretty much know who wins however.
Could someone explain to me how the question of whether American citizens are officially murderable by the U.S. government became the all-important question? Don’t the laws that an American might look to to object to getting kill-listed also protect those pesky foreigners? There’s nothing about citizenship in the Fifth Amendment.
I get the rhetorical value of pointing out to Americans that what they likely consider their safe havens of citizenship and geography are illusory, but at this point that tail is completely wagging the dog, and all that anyone seems to be interested in is keeping Americans outside the death squads’ sights.
Well, legally, morally, and practically, I don’t think you are going to find that to be a defensible frontier. In fact, in that extremely limited sense, I find myself siding with Obama’s memo writers (not a place I want to be): I also wouldn’t take seriously the objections of people who think the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life by the government is just for Americans.
So I humbly suggest making a bit less of American citizens’ supposed special immunities in this regard, and perhaps making use of such musty concepts as rule of law and human rights.
Precisely. It’s the scene from Cab Driver where Robert Dinero says, “you looking at me?”
????? I have no idea what you are talking about..sorry..
You can start the Blame there..and rightly so..
But Obama has gone so much further…and now has his White Papers to justify Murdering American and Murdering the Constitution! And Congress has no oversight!! Or presently has no oversight!
Can we burry the Pom poms now???
This sure is change..but I never had hope in this guy!!
Constitutional Lawyer?? And I am the pope!
I guess the crazies that are holling \”they are coming for our guns\”point is mute.The government can just drop a bomb on them and make up the rules up as they go along The Philadelphia Police Department forgot about The V and XIV Amendments in 19885 when they drop a bomb on people in the middle of a block that killed 25 people and destroyed about 65 houses. I guess they didn’t need any so-called Memo or White Paper. Just the other day our President was saying that\” them use to be us\”in a speech on immigration . The Philadelphia Police is still arguing that the\”them never became us\”. My government have not change . The serving the same soup with difference spoons on a gobal scale.
Any one have ideas on the leak source?
If it’s the Admin, I suspect they may be looking to use the Brennan confirmation as a backdoor approval of Obama’s kill list… avoiding any real Senate discussion on assassinations, but allowing for Brennan’s confirmation to be cited in the future… when someone questions Obama’s assassinations.
If it’s the Congress, they may be looking to scuttle the Brennan nomination and start a real discussion on executive authority / boundaries.
I could see either being possible… but have no idea who leaked it. And I wonder if it was a “Jim Casey authorized” leak or a “Bradley Manning unauthorized” leak.
So sad.
Actually there is a Constitutional distinction. Foreign nationals can’t be tried for Treason – that’s a citizen-specific crime, which those like Alwaki are accused of, but Obama just kills them rather than actually proves that they waged war against the US. The Constitution is actually quite specific on how Obama should be treating US citizens accused of waging war against the US:
“Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.”
This is in distinction from someone like Bin Laden, who wasn’t a US citizen. That being said, I don’t think Obama is following the rules of war with accused non-citizens either.
Assassination is now a form of “justice.” Recently top administration officials, Clinton etc., have been bragging that they “have brought bin Laden to justice.”
One of Obama’s first acts four years ago was to prohibit the CIA from detaining and torturing suspected “terrorists.” In return the CIA was allowed to assassinate “suspected terrorists” including Americans. This DOJ white paper is a part of that new policy. The government lawyers are now authorizing assassination in a similar way to their past authorization of torture.
Government lawyers do what they’re told to do, or they don’t remain government lawyers. It has nothing to do with law or the Constitution.
The term operational leader is pretty vague. Could this be a chance to get rid of Carl Rove? Donald Trump, Rush and Glenn? Hannity? Their motives are pretty suspect. Just wonderin’.
Typo…
Don’t forget, he’s a Professor of Constitutional Law! He knows best.
Yay for Holder! I hope he soon gets an honorary doctorate in creative writing.
Only if your name is Obama. Glassfish Obama????? Would your mother really do that to you??
I was gonna stand up and declare this wrong, but my momma didn’t raise no stupid children.
Don: always appreciate your perspective.
So, we are no longer torturing “suspected” terrorists, we just kill them outright?
Sounds like something that dick Cheney would do.
I think it was Dan Senor and Harold Ford on Morning Joe a few mos ago… arguing over the merits of torture vs. assassination.
Orwellian to say the least. Sounds like the sort of conversations that may have occurred in Stalin’s inner circle.
“They thought they were free.” What incredulous historian will write about the Americans of the 21st century.
“But the stock market is up today so everything is O.K.” This is what the low information rich guy is saying.
Am I the only one missing the Cold War?? I remember vividly as a child ducking under desks and sitting in hallways with our coats over our heads…then being walked in line to Tin shelters..will children today be hiding under desks from our own Governments drones??
The Statue of Liberty..has tears running down her face..but soon Blood may replace those tears!
Bush cemented neoconservatism into our empire policy and now Obama is cementing neoliberalism into the domestic. Why are people so surprised at this?
The bloodlust of 911, the rise of China a the new planetary economic engine, the revolutionary tendencies of the Internet and Wikileaks, and the pending climate catastrophes (food scarcity, envmntl refugees, etc) all require this shift by the corporate militarist state, and the nativist libertarians just feed off it like pigs at a trough, making the situation far worse with their childish violent fantasies and anti-science intolerance.
No, I don’t see how any of that is applicable to this discussion, except again in the rhetorical sense I acknowledged in my first comment.
No one in this era is being “accused of” treason. Maybe TV talking heads use that language but neither Awlaki nor anybody else these daya has been, or is in danger of being, indicted for the federal crime of Treason. When indictments and prosecutions occur, they are for crimes such as material support of terrorism, which are not solely applicable to American citizens.
And the abductions (sorry, renditions), imprisonment (sorry, indefinite detention), and murders (sorry … actually I’m not quite sure of the accepted euphemism for these) being committed by the U.S. government under the GWOT rubric are not conceived by anybody as being inflicted specifically on Americans deemed to have violated their duty of loyalty to the U.S., as would be the case with treason.
This is how our free press reports this story …
So being a “suspected” AQ member that continuously hates America and has bad thoughts…pretty much opens up everyone outside the Bohemian club as potential drone targets.
That is one view.
Constitutional scholars disagree among themselves on this.
Serial killers.
“Surge” in Afghanistan. NDAA. Refusal to prosecute Bush regime war crimes. Refusal to prosecute Wall Street fraudsters. Escalation of drone killings worldwide. Refusal to close Guantanamo concentration camp. Continuation of rendition (kidnapping). Illegal war on Libya. Sending U.S. troops to 35 African nations. Asian military pivot. Rhetoric but no action to mitigate climate change. Support for fracking and Keystone pipeline. “Legal authorization” to kill Americans.
Meet the new boss, WORSE than the old boss.
So you actually believe the following?
1. The Founders, who just suffered through a long and bloody revolution to achieve a nation, actually wanted to arm their own citizens to be able to overthrow them?
2. AR-15 assault rifles will be able to “defend” against tanks and helicopter gunships as well as armed drones?
What does “A well-regulated militia” mean to you? The Founders were leery about a permanent standing army as we have now, so a citizen militia was preferable to them.
By 1789, the Founders had real concerns about an armed populace. I think the intention of the 2nd amendment was avoiding tyranny. But Shay’s Rebellion and the Whiskey Rebellion both happened during the 1780s, I think. As such, the phrases “ensuring domestic tranquility” and “public insurrection” worked their way into the Constitution.
The Founders wanted the US Constitution to survive… and they knew that was a delicate balancing act.
If another revolution ever does come to America, I doubt it would be driven by AR-15s. I’m guessing it would look more like Iraq 2006, than America 1776: IEDs, mini-drones with explosives, etc.
I would argue that we don’t actually have a free press. We have a newsertainment industry that parses words to fit ideological or commercial arguments. The actual (if it is the actual) memo as reported states
“A confidential Justice Department memo concludes that the U.S. government can order the killing of American citizens if they are believed to be “senior operational leaders” of al-Qaida or “an associated force” — even if there is no intelligence indicating they are engaged in an active plot to attack the U.S…”
Actual intelligence of indication of an active plot is not even required. Guilt by association.
The conservative press will report this as a breach of Constitutional law and call for impeachment regardless of history relating to the previous Administration.
The Liberal press will report this as a breach of Constitution and plant blame totally on the Bush administration. The current Administrations action will be justified by results.
Both sides have a narrative to adhere to when reporting. Newsertainment is advertiser driven and rating driven. Reporters do not have the freedom to report as desired or at this stage the desire to report unvarnished truth. Reporter know that to get a job in today’s news entertainment industry, you have to tailor reporting to the narrative of those who would hire you.
The days of unbiased truthful reporting have been replaced with selective reporting, half truths and repeated falsehoods. You know? A coke and a Smile.
I think Glenn Greenwald gave you a pretty decent answer.
Morally, no distinction. Constitutionally, there is. And pragmatically, a government killing its own citizens by secret decree of guilt can be used as a menacing form of control over them – they don’t control those dirty foreigners (at least not formally).
Any Obama voters got the integrity to come forward and admit they did the wrong thing? If not, how much further down this enabling comprador road are you willing to go and still feel entitled to claim no moral culpability for yourselves? (Imagine you are a German in the 1930s, if that helps you focus.) I think that is a fair challenge.
Sorry I should have put free in quotes. Corporations own all the major media and control most all the information. That is why no one from the media was at the xlpipeline tree sit in Winfield.
I think many firebaggers voted for Jill or Rocky. Not too many voted for Obama last fall.
Well say what you will. But I am just so happy Cheney is no longer a “high level” official. Gotta like the little things.theres nothing else.
There’s a simple countermeasure – move to a drone-proof city.
Ummm are you sure about that ? There are times when women have been known to be superb killers, ruthless even.
Firebaggers? No, but there are obviously many here who would actively abjure that label. They are the ones I am challenging. They are the enablers, they are where the numbers are, they are where the increased pressure for change must come from, IMO.
Cost us billions and billions of $ and many dead and wounded soldiers to stop or get rid of some silly Iraqi’s with some gun powder and Cell Phones!!
In one of the longest wars in our History!
When can we expect TBoggs’s condescending, snarked-filled, tortuous blog in defense of this?
He is in TROLL status so don’t feed him!!! pretty please.
My take on a number of comments and concepts.
The second Constitution, the one we have now, came about to guard against more rebellions like Shay’s. The propertied (white male) affluent were worried that the separate states might be succumb to demands by the local (unpropertied) masses.
Hence a Constitution that empowered a Federal Government was devised.
But the southern states in giving up much of the local authority they had under the first constitution were very concerned that the new federal authority could and would banish slavery.
The second amendment had little to do in protecting against tyranny. In fact, it enshrined it. It was in place to guarantee armed slave patrols.
Slave insurrection was brutally suppressed.
Really? Do we, honestly and truly, have a better boss now than Cheney? Are we now, as a nation, operating on the side of the Light? Or, as this and other diaries make clear, are we not now descending further into the Pit of Darkness?
I’ll answer for you: torture is worse than murder.
I say again, really? What sort of a lesser evil argument is this?
Yeah, and that little corporal with the mustache too. I can’t believe this is OUR country.
You gotto LOVE that one.
Well……..it sounds bad when you put it that way./s
Agreed. I voted for Jill.
Several times. Shhhh.
I keep lowering the bar and the Obama administration keeps limbowing under it.
Its’ ALL verrrrry disturbing.
I just posted a reply to Glenn’s reply to me. Let me know what you think about it.
I think Glenn was blowing smoke about the citizen/non-citizen distinction having a basis is Supreme Court cases with respect to the Fifth Amendment right against deprivation of life by the government without due process. If you know otherwise, I would be grateful to be enlightened. (I know there are such as things as real wars and battlefields, but the short answer to that is that even there, the individual nationality of enemy soldiers is not relevant to the legality of killing them.)
The impetus for my comments to both DSWright and to Glenn was not a conviction that the citizen/non-citizen question is completely off-limits for discussion in this context. Rather, it is as I said initially, a matter of the tail wagging the dog. I see so little discussion of this horrible disintegration of the rule of law except in the “even U.S. citizens” frame. It’s a matter of proportion.
In my opinion it has become harmful and counterproductive in gradually (implicitly) conceding the ground of death-squadding and droning non-U.S.-citizens.
I could write something parodying some of the reactions to this, but I could never top this:
Needs moar “WAKE-UP SHEEPLE!!!”
“…Cheney is no longer a “high level” official. ”
I wonder what makes you so sure? He may be scheming from a new undisclosed location, but the policies are the same. Or perhaps we should say, the policies have continued slithering down the same horrifying path as before.
you might get a couple kills, but you’re still dead in the end.
I know there’s history here among long-time FDLers that I don’t know, and am not taking sides on.
But, TBogg, what you quoted here, wherever it’s from (I can’t see it in this thread; sorry if I’ve overlooked it): you may find it far-fetched as worry for people in this country. You may be right; who knows for sure.
But life in constant fear of the drones is reality TODAY, and has been for years, with no relief in sight, for whole populations in Afghanistan, who live with the constant sound of planes too far up to see, the terror of death and destruction from above coming without warning, the shame of not helping the wounded because of the double-tap tactic.
It’s real life for real people, courtesy of the U.S.A., and mocking the fear it may elicit in people who are, happily, not yet subjected to it is gross.
And you can say the same thing to Iraqi Resistance fighters, or to the Afghans, and they will direct your attention to the scoreboard. Your team scored more points, they nod and smile, but you lost anyway.
If Bush was President and released this the Obamabots would be in turmoil.
Well, if you truly accept that as the controlling logic, you must advocate complete repeal of the Second Amendment, since its purpose disappeared completely with the abolition of slavery? (Imagine partial snark tag here.) If one had the temerity to remember the stirring words of the Declaration of Independence, one might venture a more generalized principle to be promoted by the Second Amendment, no?
I bet that Zimmerman guy feels comforted lol.
Just a guess. Last October, it seemed to me that not many regular commenters here were going to vote for Obama.
This is illegal, immoral and an offense to our constitution-
At this point, with the wholesale spying, the secret prisons, the indefinite detention without trial and the extra-judicial killings, and the transformation from what was once a constitutional government, to a completely extra-constitutional, for profit entity…….
There is no longer any obligation to abide this government, they are currently a criminal enterprise, in breech of their oaths of office.
Sorry if we disturbed you, go back to sleep now. Your pittance of a check is in the mail.
Didn’t mean to offend. Sorry if I did.
I kinda like the name firebagger though. Who coined it? Was it Gibbs? I take it to mean “one who does not back down from power even in the face of great adversity.”
That’s how I view Jane, DDay, Kevin and others… and I like to think that I’m willing to speak truth to power… though that’s for others to decide. :)
You may be forgiven for under-counting the not-visible-now, but you can find them congregated in mutual self-satisfied admiration at the various clique-chat posts. Including the Boggfogateria. And you certainly did not offend me-I’ve seen enough of your comments to know that your eyes are open. To me, firebaggers are the ones who rejected the good cop Dems. Proud to consider myself one.
psssssst. Did I see him on Comedy Central last night? The segment where they were pretending to be morally bankrupt and skewering folks in pain over their empathy?
SanctimoniusX
Needs moar “grifting for Obama” failed white people humorist downtown clowning!
Exactly. Do you want only the military, police, blue-shirts and private security firms protecting the elite, to be the only ones allowed to bear arms?
When they are roaming the streets looking for “dissidents” should we “thank them for their service?” And what would that service be? To protect the average citizen?
Think again.
And a “Nobel Peace Prize Winner!” Who knew murder, death and destruction are just synonyms for peace.
Yes. If the government devolves into a tyranny, even the founding fathers said another revolution is appropriate.
2. AR-15 assault rifles will be able to “defend” against tanks and helicopter gunships as well as armed drones?
Yes. 300 million armed citizens are larger and more powerful than you think. Look at Afghanistan, what did/do those citizens have against the all-mighty powerful Soviets and now Amerikans?
New “O” motto – “Fair and Balanced”.
Makes that asshole Dick Cheney look like a model of restraint by comparison.
Question: Has the Nobel Peace Prize ever been revoked?
Once the 300 million wake up and demand change they won’t even need guns.
Bingo!
That’s a good one.
No, try Public Law No: 107–40, passed by Congress with over 525 votes in favor on September 14, 2001 under the 11th enumerated powers of Congress (or possibly indirectly under the 10th enumerated power of Congress):
(To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations);
To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;
The Constitution states:
The President shall be Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States; he may require the Opinion, in writing, of the principal Officer in each of the executive Departments, upon any Subject relating to the Duties of their respective Offices,
PL107-40 requires the Commander in Chief to wage endless global war against individuals:
(a) IN GENERAL- That the President is authorized to use all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons he determines planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such organizations or persons, in order to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States by such nations, organizations or persons.
In 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012 We the People ratified PL107-40 by reelecting the overwhelming majority of Congress who voted for this declared unending global war on individuals, and not a single person has been elected to Congress on his campaign promise to repeal PL107-40. I know of no member of Congress challenged on his vote or support for PL107-40, which is the declaration of endless global war on individuals.