There may not be anyone left in America that doesn’t know Wall Street sets the agenda in Washington, that the revolving door between finance capital and the so-called regulators of finance capital spins so fast the IAEA should demand inspections. And so we learn that President Obama’s Treasury Secretary nominee not only worked for the Citigroup hedge fund that shorted the housing market, invested in off-shore tax havens, and took a nice bonus from TARP money – he had a provision written into his employment contract that encouraged him to return to government service.
Lew’s employment agreement with Citigroup said his “guaranteed incentive and retention award” wouldn’t be paid if he quit his job, with limited exceptions. One was if he left Citigroup “as a result of your acceptance of a full-time high level position with the United States government or regulatory body.” This applied if he left “prior to the payment of any incentive and retention award for performance year 2008 or thereafter.” Such an award wasn’t guaranteed but would be consistent with the company’s practice, the document said…
When I asked Citigroup what its rationale was for including the government-service exception, a spokeswoman, Danielle Romero-Apsilos, said: “Citi routinely accommodates individuals who wish to leave the firm to pursue a position in government or nonprofit sector.” I pointed out that the contract terms I was asking about didn’t mention anything about a nonprofit, but she declined to elaborate on her statement.
The agreement makes no such mention of “non-profit” work. Is anyone surprised? How would Citigroup capitalize on that? No, Citigroup wants friends in high places, it wants puppets in power to give the bank further subsidies and favoritism. The Too Big To Fail bank seems to have secured itself another term of handouts with the Lew appointment, playing the old bribery game.
Citi has been an especially nice landing spot for big-shot Democrats. Former White House budget director Peter Orszag is now a Citigroup vice chairman and somehow finds time to write a column for Bloomberg News. And there was former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin, who was paid more than $115 million while encouraging the risk-taking that would have destroyed Citi if not for a taxpayer rescue.
Mr. Rubin was Mr. Lew’s patron at the bank. Mr. Lew’s contract suggests that Citi knew from the start that Mr. Lew was headed back to a powerful job in Washington, and that it wanted him to remember the bank fondly when he left.
Paying someone a few million dollars is a good way to ensure you are thought of fondly. And making sure if they go back into government service – as they may have hinted they will do – that they receive all the bonuses you have just conjured up is so pleasant. It’s not bribery because…
In any case Citigroup will continue its long streak of having undue influence at Treasury, Geithner has already done his part, now it’s Lew’s turn.





14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Pirate Jack in the news again.
When can we really start talking about Corporations running our Country?
Hmm?
Lew interesting because finance capital is not a homogeneous group. Lew’s appointment reveals that Shittybank faction is up & Goldman Sucks faction is down.
I almost put that in – is that the difference between the Two Parties now? Goldman vs. Citi
We probaby need to give a hat tip to (of all people) Orrin Hatch for bringing this up in Lew’s confirmation hearing.
Funny how partisanship works out sometimes.
I don’t know; trying to figure out how to figure it out. Like Kremlin watching used to be: who is standing next to whom in the photographs.
What got me into this aspect of the corrupt USG is that there were a raft of top admirals & generals dismissed around the time that Petreaus “resigned.” Tarpley thought that was a mop-up operation of an attempted neocon coup.
Whatever that was (Tarpley is savvy about such matters but not inevitably right), it occurred to me if coups, or palace intrigues if you prefer, occur not just in military branch, but could be found in all areas of govt as big & powerful as USG. So I started looking for them in a casual, amateur way.
So let me get this straight,the Dems on the finance committee,you know the DNC is for ordinary Americans,would have been OK with this not coming out ?
Wake up people,both parties represent the rich,you and I are idiots foot soldiers who at election time are expected to choose between worse(DNC) & (GOP)worse.
This is just plain stealing of our treasury.How can this happen in a Democracy ?
Dem chair of Senate Finance Committee is Max “Affordable Care Act” Baucus. Need I say more?
How can it happen in a democracy? Simple Senate rules of seniority in chairs plus lots of K-Street cash.
I’m thinking GS wants to get in the background and let Citi be the frontrunner as austerity plunges us into Depression. They have allot of forward thinking strategists and PR is paramount.
John Snow, Bush’s (the lessor) 2nd secretary of treasury, had a contracted financial incentive to leave CSX and return to government.
After treasury, he went to head the investment bank that owned Chrysler (really just a bet that the government would always bail Chrysler out).
Lew spent much of his time on the gov’t side of the revolving door. He worked for Tip O’Neill on the SS “compromise” (that Obama praises) that cut benefits by 19%, and for Clinton on the Balanced Budget Act (Wikipedia link).
Whatever this appointment may mean about a financial sector split (not qualified to opine either way), among probably many choices for a corporate tool appointee, he does have a government sector history that’s particularly applicable for Obama’s austerity goals.
It could be as simple as Citi making a better post 2016 deal for Barry if he moved them to the front of the line, he is, after all, a Rubin fanboy.
So revolving doors now have approach ramps?
… good points minIL …hmmm…imagine that…Obama seeking such skill sets