More evidence the Dodd-Frank reform law was an exercise in futility as Reuters reports Goldman Sachs may have already found a work around. Under the new law investment banks such as Goldman Sachs are supposed to be prohibited from making risky private equity investments under the Volcker Rule. But sources reveal that Goldman has simply altered some of the structure of the financing in order to bypass the rule.
The Volcker rule – named for former Federal Reserve Chairman Paul Volcker and part of the Dodd-Frank financial reform law – is expected to limit bank investments in private equity funds, but not necessarily private equity-style investments outside of a formal fund structure. The rule’s main goal is to prevent federally insured banks from gambling in the markets or taking on too much risk with hedge funds and private-equity funds.
In a bid to pool money for deals without raising a private equity fund, the Wall Street bank has been lining up clients who are willing to put money into accounts set up to invest in private equity-style deals, the sources said. Goldman would also set aside some of its own money and partner capital into separate accounts for the same purpose, they said.
Under the new plan, Goldman would then make investments in a syndicate fashion, contributing investor money, along with its own capital and partner dollars, the sources said.
The difference being the money will not be pooled into a fund. That’s it. No real difference just a quick tweak and there goes the Dodd-Frank regulations.
“It is the same pitch as before, ‘We are putting a lot of our own money in this,’” said a person familiar with Goldman’s marketing of the new business. “They are saying, ‘We are still in this business.’“…
Goldman is betting that its investments not tied up in funds will be protected from Volcker rule.
So Goldman Sachs can still engage in the same kind of investment activity it did before the crisis free of Dodd-Frank. What’s changed? Now Goldman, along with the other Too Big To Fail banks, has a federal bailout guarantee – which is even less of an incentive to manage risk well for the long term.
In exchange for the bailouts America was promised regulation of Wall Street but as banksters evade the weak regulations the only substantive and lasting reform seems to be institutionalizing Too Big To Fail and creating an unarrestable class of businessmen.
Photo by Asa Mahat | Fortune Live Media under Creative Commons license






15 Comments


Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
This is about bright-line tests, the kind that are easy to work around. This is what you get when you can’t bring yourself to abolish Glass-Steagall.
Abolish Gramm-Leach-Bliley; restore Glass-Steagall. But yes, this is what happens when you install a class exempt from the laws governing the rest of us. Look for more financial disasters on the order of 2007-2009 soon.
Sorry, how is having money in several accounts invested TOGETHER somehow different than having money in one account/fund invested TOGETHER?
I think a $2 lawyer would rip GS to pieces in court.
P.S. Why are there always so many sheep ready for the shearing? Is it the Madoff factor(?) where people just can’t stay away from ‘a sure thing’?
Evabody wansa be a bank. Ain’t nobody don’t neva wanna work within the laws governing banks.
And will Obama and HIS DoJ stand idly by and let this happen?????
You betcha.
Remember we are all created equal but some are more equal than others. The end of this will be like Animal Farm or Soviet Union but it will end.
More like Lord of the Flies combined with Animal Farm.
I heard Robert Reich on National Propoganda Radio giving some kind of Town Hall-type talk. He stated that Glass-Steigel should definitely be re-instatated, fwiw. And he rushed to clarify that he was no longer in Clinton’s cabinet when the Big Dawg signed on the dotted line to revoke Glass-Steigel.
And so: on it goes….
I see what you did there.
Before the Bush Administration, just over $1.00 was the highest price we had ever paid for gasoline. In 08 gas cost over $4.00 a gallon in many places. Corn, which represents food had been in the vicinity of $3.00 a bushel, before Bush. Corn went to $7.25 a bushel in 08 before the drought when there was an abundance of corn. Those price increases cost the average family $350. more a month to live. If you take that much out of a persons income who is just getting by, it will cause intense suffering in a very short time. They wont have enough for house repairs, dental visits, or other necessities.
Those price increases were the result of “commodity market manipulation”. Goldman Sachs didn’t know squat about commodities or commodity market manipulation, but they had a lot of money and they knew who to give it to. The CFTC, which is the agency designed to protect us from commodity market manipulation, couldn’t protect themselves from “corrupt politicians” who ordered them to overlook “commodity market manipulation”.
Employees at the CFTC donated to Barack Obama’s campaign for president. They were certain that he would investigate the “commodity market manipulation” that had gone on during the Bush Administration, but we all know what happened after Obama was elected. Go to this website for confirmation of what you just read http://wp.me/p2vRlu-4
It appears as though Dodd-Franks is functioning as it was intended.
As a jobs program for bankster lawyers?
The only thing Goldman Sachs “found” was where their reps (R-GS) put the loophole they bought in the text of the Dodd-Frank bill. The results were intentional. Until some regulator takes them to court for playing symantics with the letter of the law, these sophists will continue to manipulate the law to their will.
Only if they can drive through those Mack truck sized loopholes!
In the meanwhile Obama tries to trade away Social Security cuts (that he has no right or business even considering) in return for “closing” a few billionaire tax loopholes…