12 Occupy Philadelphia protesters who staged a sit in at a Wells Fargo bank in Center City Philadelphia were acquitted of charges of conspiracy and defiant trespass for a 2011 protest during the Occupy Wall Street movement.
The 12 – one woman and 11 men – were arrested Nov. 18, 2011 when they staged a sit-in inside the Wells Fargo branch at 17th and Market Streets. The protesters said they wanted to call attention to what they called Wells Fargo’s “racist predatory lending” policies that caused a disproportionately large number of home foreclosures in African American neighborhoods.
“If this jury has found us innocent then it must mean that Wells Fargo is guilty,” said an elated 71-year-old Willard R. Johnson, one of the 12 on trial.
Occupy Philly had accused Wells Fargo of redlining and targeting African American communities for predatory loans. Protesters seemed to have grounds as a series of lawsuits have been initiated by governments and interest groups against the Too Big To Fail banks over discriminatory lending policy. Such as the ACLU’s lawsuit against Morgan Stanley and of course Wells Fargo’s own $175 million settlement with the Justice Department over racial discrimination in housing.
An investigation by the department’s civil rights division found that mortgage brokers working with Wells Fargo had charged higher fees and rates to more than 30,000 minority borrowers across the country than they had to white borrowers who posed the same credit risk, according to a complaint filed on Thursday along with the proposed settlement.
Wells Fargo brokers also steered more than 4,000 minority borrowers into costlier subprime mortgages when white borrowers with similar credit risk profiles had received regular loans, a Justice Department complaint found. The deal covers the subprime bubble years of 2004 to 2009.
Thomas Perez, the assistant attorney general for the civil rights division, said the practices amounted to a “racial surtax,” adding: “All too frequently, Wells Fargo’s African-American and Latino borrowers had no idea they could have gotten a better deal — no idea that white borrowers with similar credit would pay less.”
As for the protesters even the judge had some nice things to say about them when the trial was completed.
Judge Nina N. Wright Padilla asked all 12 to approach so she could shake their hands.
“I hope you continue your work in a law-abiding way,” said Padilla. “I must say you are the most affable group of defendants I’ve ever come across.”





14 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Corporations such as Wells Fargo, love Mammon’s appendage. While paying homage to his appendage, the republic and its citizens suffer the consequences of corporate’s scum buggery, in the lust for the buck!
“Corporate crackheads,” looking for that quick fix as junkies do. Their drug of choice is “money,” hence power greed and avarice.
Nice to here a judge actually rule on the “merits,”
opposed to embracing fascistic camel dung, while gutting checks and balances, fixing the outcome like some international soccer game, rigged by bookies???
This group was protesting racism, but I have to wonder if the praise of the judge was tinged with it as well. Would she have been preconditioned to find them affable if eleven of them had been black?
Good news. Thanks for the information! WF is a criminal enterprise.
Excellent!
Congrats and solidarity to Occupy Philly!
from the Philadelphia News article linked above:
“a confrontation between free-speech and private property rights – was the first in which Occupy protesters were convicted of a crime.
Last June, Municipal Court President Judge Marsha H. Neifield found all guilty of the trespass charge and fined each $500 plus court costs.
Under Philadelphia court rules, people found guilty in Municipal Court have the right to a new trial in Common Pleas Court.”
it took 5 volunteer defense lawers and 13 hours of jury deliberations on the tresspass conviction –the original charges were criminal conspiracy and tresspass. I applaud the 15-month battle to this “victory,” but I deplore the fact that Wells Fargo Corporation incurred no cost for the use of the police, courts, attornies and the time, fear, turmoil and stress endured by 12 humans protesting criminal acts by the wells fargo corporation that were knowingly and willfully inflicted upon thousands of deceived borrowers who have not and will not be compensated for the corps’ usurous practices.
Congratulations and thank you, Occupy Philadelphia. Great work, defense lawyers, judge, and jury.
Tough to do.
OWS Demographics
Ethnicity Data
White 81.2%
Other 7.6%
Hispanic / Latino 6.8%
Asian 2.8%
Black / African American 1.6%
There is a very good reason why Black / African American participation in Occupy is so low. In any confrontation with police, members of that group would be the first to be targeted for arrest. Also, because that group is routinely subject to targeting by police, any arrest at a peaceful protest could be complicated by prior convictions. Instead of a small fine, a misdemeanor conviction could result in jail time.
For the record, two of the most impassioned and eloquent members of the defense team were black. According to your theory, the judge should have been biased against them. It turns out she wasn’t.
But it is the protestors who were called affable. For the record, I am fine with protestors who are not affable.
:)
Congrats, best news so far today!
Well, it’s about time. <3