Among the group’s main findings:
- More than 70 percent of those who died of direct war violence in Iraq have been civilians — an estimated 134,000. This number does not account for indirect deaths due to increased vulnerability to disease or injury as a result of war-degraded conditions. That number is estimated to be several times higher.
- The Iraq War will ultimately cost U.S. taxpayers at least $2.2 trillion. Because the Iraq war appropriations were funded by borrowing, cumulative interest through 2053 could amount to more than $3.9 trillion.
- Th $2.2 trillion figure includes care for veterans who were injured in the war in Iraq, which will cost the United States almost $500 billion through 2053.
- The total of U.S. service members killed in Iraq is 4,488. At least 3,400 U.S. contractors have died as well, a number often under-reported.
- Terrorism in Iraq increased dramatically as a result of the invasion and tactics and fighters were exported to Syria and other neighboring countries.
- Iraq’s health care infrastructure remains devastated from sanctions and war. More than half of Iraq’s medical doctors left the country during the 2000s, and tens of thousands of Iraqi patients are forced to seek health care outside the country.
- The $60 billion spent on reconstruction for Iraq has not gone to rebuilding infrastructure such as roads, health care, and water treatment systems, but primarily to the military and police. The Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction has found massive fraud, waste, and abuse of reconstruction funds.
Remember Washington spends too much on social programs. We need to cut Social Security and Medicare because we can not afford such extravagances. Instead, we should spend trillions of dollars on fruitless wars that kill thousands of our people and possibly hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who get caught in the crossfire.
The Neoliberals got their war and now they want to cut social programs to pay for it.




61 Comments

Support this site!
Subscribe to the newsletter
Advertise on Firedoglake
Send
us your tips
Make us your homepage
About FDL News Desk
Typo: Cost is an irregular verb.
“Costed” might be used in such a phrase as “News reports in 2003 said that the Bush administration had costed an Iraq war at about $50 billion.”
Bush Fired Larry Lindsey for Saying the War Might Cost $100 Billion
Good times.
“At least” 134000 civilians is right.
For a good while, the U.S. was the only counter of casualties and we did not even bother counting Iraqi casualties and wounded.
As always, Dan, thank you for reporting the truth of things.
I would add that Glen Ford, of Black Agenda Report, has well summed up our current reality with this article:
http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/us-scorched-earth-policy-ten-years-after-iraq-invasion
The Exceptional Empire seems intent on going “out” not with a whimper, but the biggest bang possible … and it is all “done” in our name, yours and mine …
Endless destruction … relentless oppression … and sanctioned, open-ended greed.
And it will not stop until forced to do so.
Sweet reason will not avail until and unless the many, “the people” come to understand … and then find, somehow, the courage to say, “No more!”
Namaste
DW
Better get our financial house in order sooner rather than later.
By zee way, Dan, it should, as zapkitty points out @ 1, be “Cost” … not “Costed”, there, in the headline …
;~DW
As something to ponder, among the costs, one might find many of the comments to this article to be both disturbed and disturbing … were we, as a nation, not “exceptionalism” personified.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/03/15/us-drone-strikes-pakistan_n_2883014.html
Not only does our government, regardless of which legacy party is in “power”, pursue violence as fundamental policy, but, apparently, many “good” USians happily “believe” that the USA should do whatever it damned well pleases.
T’would seem that “Kill them all and let God sort them out …” well ought to be our “official” motto. If we can’t stamp it on our coins, then we should consider printing it on our paper money … just to remind us of our purpose: “This is not a democracy it is a business.”
Amerika uber alles!
The banality and ubiquity of such smug (if ignorant) complacency and hubris does not bode well for our collective human future …
Ah well …
DW
DW, this new kid is allright!
You German accent is resurfacing dumkoph.
This is unworthy of Firedoglake.
1. “One of America’s dumbest wars.” This war was criminal, evil and destructive….to call it dumb is to trivialize it.
2. The death toll for Iraqis is much much higher.
Any number of studies show this:
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/15/world/asia/daw-aung-san-suu-kyi-heckled-over-support-of-mine-in-myanmar.html?nl=todaysheadlines&emc=edit_th_20130315
3. Cheney and Wolfowitz are “neoliberals?” That makes no sense.
4. Much more attention to money than lives in the article.
Sloppy work.
The “Monroe Doctrine” gone global.
The FDL book chat sjould invite back the author of a ” 3 trillion dollar war” for another chat.
http://firedoglake.com/2008/03/23/the-three-trillion-dollar-war-with-linda-bilmes/
We should it call it the Left has been right Right about Everything since Bush was President and we warned you. Other topics for this series of articles could be the economy, healthcare, the housing bubble etc.
Time to invite General Shinseki to FDL also.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Shinseki
There needs to be a list of all the contractors who profited from the war. They need to pay back the money that was borrowed to enrich them.
God is knowledge Saint Augestine said therefore stupid is evil.
Seconded but which expert should we talk to to get more information on that? It seems to me we should be asking them for cash with interest before we cut SS and medicare.
Just where did the money go how much of it went to Bush family friends and big GOP contributers what was their profit margin on these contracts, how many of these contracts were fulfilled on time and the work was done to satisfaction?
Woops, sorry about that.
How many mercs were killed?
How many civilian contractors American and foreign were killed?
Your link is about Burma not the number of dead in Iraq.
i suppose this means more cuts to SS now:(
We spent tons of money on the Iraq war if war spending stimulates the economy then the cost of war was greater than the stimulus effect of this war spending.
Driftglass says:
The Left – Taking Shit For Being Right Since Before You Were Born
X2 Things and marym
Or to put it another way
http://niv.scripturetext.com/matthew/5.htm
A lot of fundies are sure going to be surprised on judgement day.
Global Warming invite Al Gore thats another issue we were right about.
This is the best idea going forward. Start a war tax that applies to every company and individual (actual person) who profited from the war. Halliburton could be “taxed” out of existence for all the waste/fraud they were responsible for just in this report. No one should be able to enrich themselves by war profiteering; if that were in the Constitution we wouldn’t need much else to protect our putative Democracy.
None of those numbers mean a thing to the people that did this. They didn’t pay any of it. Part of that figure went into their own personal pockets…the motive in the first place. We have to pay for all these wars and they are taking from us to do it. Meanwhile, it makes them richer. All of those equations inflates their power.
As far as those dead, the deciders care no more than you mourned the cow that died for your dinner. No one they love will ever die in these wars or even see them.
It used to be when people said the elite think people are cattle they were exaggerating or they thought they were. That is, in fact, wrong. They actually do think of us as cattle, no question. They don’t care if our lives are destroyed by decisions they make on a whim and, in fact, do it all the time. They want to work people into the grave for a slave wage while people at the top of these cut throat organizations make billions. They openly find a million and one ways to take everything people have like vouchers instead of health care.
America is gone. It is long gone now.
Democrats are as big of war mongers as Repubs ever dreamed of being. Voting for either party is asking for it.
Seconded but may I add we need an investigation into war fraud and then we can go after Dick’s personal cash and I suspect the Bush family trust.
The political scientist Strauss taught Bush’s Neocons he thought it was ok for the elite to lie to us cattle but given how often we were right and they were wrong…well being rich it seems does not make you elite.
The book the Difference another FDl bookchat found that if a group of non experts was diverse enough in knowledge and large enough they could get better answers to problems than the experts.
Again another person Jane should invite back to FDL.
The Author’s thoughts on how Lefty blogs come to better answers before the experts do would be interesting.
I think Cheney more than Bush. Bush not smart enough to rig the money flow. Most of it went to the contractors and the Young Republics recruited to run Iraq after the invasion. I dobt much of that found it’s way back to the Bush’s.
The ideologues identified with the Iraq war–sociopaths like Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, Dick Cheney–are called neoconservatives, though it would be fair to say that there is no difference between neoconservatives and neoliberals since they are both imperialists in favor of endless military interventions.
Thats we we need an investigation.
Scroll down a bit to the section “Others” to see the body counts for coalition partners, contractors and journalists:
http://antiwar.com/casualties/
The people who make the mistakes should pay for the mistakes tax the 1% now! Suggested FDL bumper sticker.
In related news: Dick Cheney has no regrets.
Tonight on Showtime: “The World According to Dick Cheney”
Thanks dead are dead and should be counted no matter who they are they died in our war.
I wonder how high Dick scores on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hare_Psychopathy_Checklist
Imagine if Pols, CEO’s and gun owners had to pass this test:)
True. It is a popular myth that war is good for the economy. This myth is based on the effects of WWII on the US economy. However, the only reason the US became an economic powerhouse following that war is that it was fought elsewhere. The war destroyed the economies of Europe and Japan. Thus, the US had no industrial rivals for many years following that war. During the war, economic conditions in this country included scarcities in the consumer sector because resources were needed for the war effort.
Military spending has a very small multiplier effect compared to other forms of government spending. Then there is the matter of the export of resources. We spent many billions on Iraq reconstruction that were mostly squandered or stolen, yet the Republicans in Congress were vehemently opposed to spending even one penny on US infrastructure to stimulate the US economy following the financial meltdown of 2008.
You’d a thunk we woulda got a set of “Official NFL Glasses” or something????
IIRC we still have 20,000 “consultants” at the US embassy in Baghdad. IMHO, the war has not ended until it’s a normal staffed embassy… maybe it’s something like a “cold war” in the Korean peninsula? 38,000 soldiers is tantamount to a cold war. And 20,000 consultants is the same.
If the US is broke, we shouldn’t be policing the world… and of course there’s the issue of whether we have the moral authority to police the world and tell others how to behave… no thank you. Get out of Iraq & Afghan, draw down in Korea (though I don’t fully appreciate that situation with Dennis Rodman’s BFF, so this is a lesser concern for me) and avoid getting involved in Syria… just look how well Egypt and Libya turned out from the perspective of American interests… stay out of it and fix our own bridges!
Bunch of Authoritarian bullies running the USG. :(
There is a section a little farther below for Iraqi civilian casualties with links. No reliable hard number is available, just an incomplete number based on newspaper reports and some estimates based on surveys.
AS always, thanks for your contributions.
Looks like we have a winner on all counts for Factor 1:
Factor 1: Personality “Aggressive narcissism”
- Glibness/superficial charm
- Grandiose sense of self-worth
- Pathological lying
- Conning/manipulative
- Lack of remorse or guilt
- Shallow affect (genuine emotion is short-lived and egocentric)
- Callousness; lack of empathy
- Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
Thanks :)
Much like Bush was suppose to be a People Person and Emotionally Intelligent rather than IQ intelligent I wonder about Dick and Bush’s charm.
But of course I met probable psychos in county jail when I was there for pot so maybe because of personal experience I don’t find them charming.
You can’t scam a scammer we used to say when I was young. Being powerful has made Bush and Dick lazy they don’t tell good lies they would starve on the street.
They expect everyone to believe them because they wear a nice suit, have college degrees, and political/family connections to all the Right people.
Is this a list of requirements for Congressional candidates in order to be approved by our current uniparty system?
I think you’re wrong.
There is a standard accepted method of calculating what are referred to as excess deaths caused by war.
There was a survey group think that went to Iraq, went to hospital morgues, and peoples homes. They asked the questions required to comply with the standard method. I think the group was from Johns Hopkins University.
Their result was 650,000 excess deaths.
As far as I’ve read, although it’s often described as wrong, no one is able to say what’s wrong with it. That’s cause it’s not wrong.
the number would be much higher now.
I once took a look at the number of incidents in Iraq of terrorism. Prior to the Bush and Blair criminal invasion, they were extremely low.
Iraq was listed as one of the safest countries in the world, as far as incidents of terrorism was concerned.
The Al Quaeda,, which infests Iraq now, did not exist there prior to the criminal invasion of Bush and Blair.
Both those individuals best watch where they travel over the next number of years. I predict a change is coming, with respect to who is subjected to international justice.
Every time I see these estimates it makes me very worried about my nieces and nephews, etc. There will be blowback for these atrocities. When, where, how and exactly who may be unknowable. But the why? Not even George or Dick, Paul or Rummy would miss the correct answer. Lots of blame to go around in the corridors of power. But the new American poor have but two choices in these matters; endure or die. Oddly, the same choices the Iraqi women and children were given. Paying for the follies of the wealthy elites is now an 80 hour a week job, with no overtime. But at least we’re not on the casualty list,yet.
It was Lancet that published two peer-reviewed studies.
Wikipedia article, which has additional links.
Paging Dr. Cheney. Paging Dr. Cheney…
thankyou.
It would be easy to avoid that,
1. prosecute the perpetrators of this invasion, let the world see that we are not hypocrites.
2. Close the bases scattered across the globe, and bring the armies back to their own country.
Easy.
That would go a long way to reducing “blowback”. But these people like blowback don’t they?
more power, more thrills, more moments of triumph, more pictures with sleeves rolled out, with the troops, (near but never at the scene of battle)
and most importantly, a lot more money.
All deeply religious people you know.
In the context of the necessity for the US to maintain a state of perpetual war, its murder and theft in Iraq does not amount to “one of America’s dumbest wars,” but one of its essential ones. High costs and years of violence are not failures or miscalculations. They are the desired conditions. Or do we imagine that the goals and justifications for the war were indeed what the TV has told us they were?
Total Iraqi military and civilian deaths as a direct or indirect (eg. sanctions, bombing grain silos, etc) result of non-stop US violence against that country for the past 22+ years stand at around 1.5 million. Why? In order to maintain an empire, and the hegemony and resource allocation that are essential to it, civilian populations in target countries must be broken.
“None of those numbers mean a thing to the people that did this.”
Indeed not. But those numbers also don’t mean a thing to a critical mass of US citizens who join or support the military, refuse to stop over-consuming, rationalize torture, vote for the enabling politicians, and are afraid and hateful of anyone not like them. Two decades of murdering and robbing Iraqis does not happen in a vacuum, by unchecked corporate mandate, or by executive fiat.
I suspect that America is not “long gone now.” What we have seen in the Middle East lately is not an abberation, not a declensionist narrative of a once-good nation, but an example of the same violent, exploitive fabric whose threads trace back to Native American genocide and slavery. The US has had a major war, on average, every generation since the French and Indian War. This is who we are and what we do as a nation.
To restate what DW posted earlier: “Kill them all and let god sort them out because this is not a democracy, this is a business.”
“No reliable hard number is available, just an incomplete number based on newspaper reports and some estimates based on surveys.”
While you are right that there is no hard number available, there is actually quite a lot of data available on Iraqi civilian casualties. Many very good studies have been conducted over the past two decades. A few of them have spent many years collecting, updating and analyzing data. I kept up on these extensively from the start of Gulf War Part I through the mid 2000s, at which time estimates ran from 1 to 2 million deaths (mostly as the result of the sanctions) with reasonable, conservative estimates around 1.25-ish.
I used to have all this info hard copy and on another computer, but it has been years since I have been up on it. However, if you look, it is out there.
I don’t know enough about the ORB or Lancet surveys to have an opinion on them. But the research from groups who actually went out and counted dead bodies and looked at morgue reports are likely more reliable. And certainly don’t pay attention to numbers reported by US newspapers.
Thank goodness the Saudis paid for the whole thing.
second good laugh of the day.
The website on my comment is about new (very interesting) developments in Burma….
For more on civilian casualties in Iraq.
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/
Thanks TCUndone…. The burma developments are interesting….but not on topic.
The link I meant to post is
http://www.projectcensored.org/top-stories/articles/1-over-one-million-iraqi-deaths-caused-by-us-occupation/
The comments section has been a lot better than the article. Incidentally why was the money cited before the deaths!!!!
Incidentally not only is “costed” wrong, as many pointed out….also…the word is “doozy.” Not dousy!!!!
I miss DDay